Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide wins on comfort and style, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running wins on durability.
The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 offers superior performance and comfort for serious runners, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav is a budget-friendly, versatile option for casual wear.
Why Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide is better
Performance
Brooks features advanced cushioning technology.
Comfort
Brooks provides a more inclusive fit.
Design
Brooks has a sleek sporty style.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running is better
Price
New Balance is significantly cheaper.
Versatility
New Balance transitions well from running to casual wear.
Weight
New Balance is lighter and more suitable for daily wear.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | DNA LOFT V3 | Fresh Foam |
| Outsole | Rubber | NDurance |
| Heel Design | Standard | Ultra Heel |
| Weight | Light | Very Light |
| Arch Support | Yes | Removable |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When comparing prices, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe is significantly cheaper than the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3. At $79.99, the New Balance shoe costs about 50% less than the Brooks option, which is priced at $159.95. This price difference of $79.96 may make the New Balance a more attractive option for budget-conscious consumers. Additionally, considering the average price over the past 90 days, the Brooks model averages $158.63, further solidifying its position as the higher-end choice.
Design and Aesthetics
The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 features a sleek sporty style, emphasizing comfort and support. Its high stack nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 construction enhances the overall fit and accommodates orthotics, making it an excellent choice for those requiring additional support. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe sports a more casual appearance with a bootie construction that provides a sock-like fit. Both shoes have appealing designs, but the Brooks offers a more athletic look, while the New Balance leans towards a lifestyle aesthetic.
Comfort and Fit
In terms of comfort, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is designed with a unique construction that adds volume for a more inclusive fit, especially beneficial for those with wider feet or specific orthotic needs. Its nylon lining and EVA insole contribute to a comfortable experience during runs. On the other hand, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam Roav features a fresh foam midsole that absorbs impact, combined with an Ultra Heel design for a secure fit. Although both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks may excel for users needing extra room and support, while the New Balance offers a snug, adaptive fit.
Performance and Cushioning
For performance, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is equipped with a nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 midsole, promising enhanced cushioning and responsiveness during runs. With a bestseller rank of 2293, it has garnered attention for its performance qualities. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam Roav showcases its fresh foam midsole that cushions your stride effectively, alongside an NDurance outsole designed for durability during road running. While both shoes excel in cushioning, the Brooks may provide a more advanced level of responsiveness suited for serious runners.
Durability
When considering durability, both shoes are constructed with materials designed to withstand regular wear. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam Roav utilizes NDurance outsole technology, ensuring it can handle road miles and everyday wear without degrading quickly. The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, with its rubber outsole, offers a reliable grip and longevity. Although both options are built to last, the specific technology in the New Balance may give it an edge for daily runners who are concerned about wear and tear.
Versatility
In terms of versatility, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe is designed to transition seamlessly from running to casual wear, making it a great all-around sneaker. Its bootie construction and adaptable fit cater to various activities beyond running. Conversely, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is primarily geared towards serious runners, providing maximum support and cushioning for athletic performance. While both shoes can be worn casually, the New Balance offers a more versatile option for those who want a single shoe for different occasions.
Brand Reputation
Both Brooks and New Balance are reputable brands in the running shoe market, each with a loyal customer base. The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, with its focus on high-performance running, appeals to serious athletes and running enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam Roav has a broader appeal due to its stylish design and comfort, making it suitable for casual wearers as well. The sales ranks of both shoes—2293 for Brooks and 2101 for New Balance—indicate their popularity, with New Balance slightly ahead, which may reflect its broader market appeal.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize advanced performance features, cushioning, and a sporty design, the Brooks option is worth the higher price tag. However, if you seek a budget-friendly, stylish shoe that offers comfort for casual wear and everyday runs, the New Balance is an excellent choice. The distinct differences in price, design, and intended use make each shoe appealing to different types of consumers, so consider your requirements before making a decision.

