Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof vs Hoka Women's Clifton 10 White/White 7.5 Medium
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof wins on waterproof and support, Hoka Women's Clifton 10 White/White 7.5 Medium wins on price and popularity.
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX excels in support and waterproof features, while the Hoka Clifton 10 offers lightweight comfort. Choose based on your running needs.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof is better
Support
Brooks offers superior support with Guiderails technology.
Waterproof
Brooks features GORE-TEX for waterproof protection.
Cushioning
Brooks provides DNA LOFT v2 cushioning for a smooth ride.
Why Hoka Women's Clifton 10 White/White 7.5 Medium is better
Weight
Hoka is lighter, making it ideal for daily runs.
Price
Hoka is more affordable at $145.
Popularity
Hoka has a higher sales rank at 2,584.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof | Hoka Women's Clifton 10 White/White 7.5 Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | HOKA |
| Model | Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX | Clifton 10 |
| Price | $165.00 | $145.00 |
| Cushion Type | DNA LOFT v2 | Ultra-light |
| Waterproof | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Women's Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX and Hoka Women's Clifton 10
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is priced at $165.00, making it about 14% more expensive than the Hoka Women’s Clifton 10, which is available for $145.00. Both shoes are designed for running but cater to different preferences in cushioning and support.
The Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is a waterproof option that provides a smooth ride and is particularly suitable for runners needing additional support. In contrast, the Clifton 10 is known for its lightweight construction and plush cushioning, appealing to those who prioritize comfort on daily runs.
Design and Aesthetics
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX features a sleek design in black, knockout pink, and aqua hues, appealing to runners who prefer a bold look. The engineered air mesh upper and 3D fit print enhance the shoe’s structure while offering a breathable fit.
On the other hand, the Hoka Women’s Clifton 10 presents a more minimalist aesthetic with a clean white color scheme. Its jacquard knit upper not only contributes to the shoe's comfort but also adds a modern touch. Both designs are visually appealing, but they cater to different style preferences, with Brooks leaning towards a colorful palette while Hoka opts for simplicity.
Cushioning and Comfort
Cushioning is a critical aspect of running shoes, and here, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX shines with its DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, designed to provide a soft and smooth ride. This shoe is particularly appealing for those seeking a plush feel underfoot, especially during long runs.
In comparison, the Hoka Clifton 10 is known for its ultra-light cushioning, which has been a fan favorite for years. It maintains the same plush experience while slightly increasing the heel-to-toe drop by 3mm, enhancing the comfort level during runs. Both shoes excel in cushioning, but the Brooks offers a more supportive ride, while the Clifton focuses on lightweight comfort.
Support and Stability
Support is a standout feature of the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX. Equipped with the Guiderails Holistic Support System, it helps maintain natural body alignment and minimizes excess movement during a run. This is particularly beneficial for runners who require additional stability.
Conversely, while the Hoka Clifton 10 does offer a comfortable fit, it does not emphasize support to the same extent as the Brooks. The Clifton is designed more for neutral runners or those who prefer a softer ride without the added structural support. Thus, if stability is a priority, the Brooks is the clear choice.
Weather Resistance
One notable feature of the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is its GORE-TEX Invisible Fit technology, which provides breathable waterproof protection. This makes it an excellent option for runners who frequently train in wet conditions or need a shoe that can withstand the elements.
In contrast, the Hoka Women’s Clifton 10 does not offer any waterproofing features. Thus, it may not be the best choice for those who run in rainy or damp environments. If you often face unpredictable weather, the waterproof capability of the Brooks becomes a significant advantage.
Fit and Sizing
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is available in a medium width, designed to accommodate various foot shapes while offering ample room. The shoe's engineered mesh upper supports a snug fit, ensuring comfort for extended wear.
The Hoka Women’s Clifton 10 is also offered in a medium width, but its focus is on a more forgiving fit that embraces the foot without feeling restrictive. This can be particularly appealing for those who prefer a looser feel during runs. Overall, both shoes cater to different fit preferences, with Brooks focusing on support and Hoka emphasizing comfort.
Performance and Usage
For performance, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX ranks at 22,780 in sales, indicating a solid presence among runners who appreciate its supportive features. It is suitable for road running, cross-training, and gym workouts, making it a versatile option for various activities.
Meanwhile, the Hoka Women’s Clifton 10 is ranked significantly higher at 2,584, which suggests it has a strong following among runners. It is particularly favored for daily maintenance miles, making it ideal for those who log consistent training sessions. Performance-wise, both shoes excel but cater to different running styles and preferences.
Which should you buy?
If you are looking for a running shoe that offers superior support, waterproof capabilities, and a structured fit, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is the better choice. However, if you prioritize lightweight cushioning and are more focused on comfort for daily runs, the Hoka Women’s Clifton 10 is an excellent option. Ultimately, the decision comes down to your specific running needs and environment.

