Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof vs Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 Road Running Shoe, Black/Pink, 8
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof wins on support and cushioning, Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 Road Running Shoe, Black/Pink, 8 wins on price and weight.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX offers superior support and advanced features, while the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof is better
Support
Brooks has advanced support features.
Waterproof
Brooks offers waterproof protection.
Cushioning
Brooks has superior cushioning technology.
Why Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 Road Running Shoe, Black/Pink, 8 is better
Price
Saucony is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Saucony is lighter.
Casual Use
Saucony is ideal for casual runners.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof | Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 Road Running Shoe, Black/Pink, 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Saucony |
| Price | $165.00 | $49.95 |
| Cushioning | DNA LOFT v2 | VERSARUN |
| Waterproof | Yes | No |
| Sales Rank | 22780 | 10869 |
Dimension comparison
Introduction
When it comes to choosing the right running shoe, two popular options on the market are the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX and the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14. The Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is priced at $165.00, while the Cohesion 14 comes in at a much lower price of $49.95, making it about 70% cheaper. This article will explore various aspects of both shoes to help you decide which one suits your running needs better.
Design and Aesthetics
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX features a sleek design that combines a black upper with knockout pink and aqua accents, presenting a sporty yet stylish look. In contrast, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 offers a simpler aesthetic with a primarily black upper accented by pink details. While both shoes have their appeal, the unique color combinations of the Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX may attract those looking for a more vibrant option.
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is crucial in a running shoe, and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX excels in this category with its new midsole that incorporates DNA LOFT v2 cushioning. This technology promises a soft ride that is particularly beneficial for long-distance runs. On the other hand, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 features VERSARUN cushioning that absorbs impact and reduces pressure, making it an excellent choice for beginners or casual runners. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks has advanced cushioning technology that may suit more serious runners.
Support and Stability
Support is a significant factor for runners, and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is designed specifically for those who need it. It includes the Guiderails Holistic Support System, which helps align your body in its natural motion path, effectively controlling excess movement. Conversely, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 does not emphasize advanced support features, focusing instead on a fluid feel for casual runners. If you require specialized support, the Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is the superior choice, but the Cohesion 14 can suffice for lighter activities.
Durability and Build Quality
Durability is key in any running shoe, and both the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX and the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 are built to last. The Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX features GORE-TEX Invisible Fit technology, which not only provides waterproof protection but also enhances the shoe's overall durability. The Cohesion 14, while not as rugged, offers a reliable build with a rubber outsole designed to withstand many miles. For runners who frequently face wet conditions, the Brooks shoe stands out for its weather-resistant features.
Performance on Different Terrains
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is versatile enough for road running, cross-training, and gym workouts, making it a well-rounded option for various activities. Its waterproof capabilities also allow for use in diverse weather conditions. In comparison, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 is primarily designed for road running, providing a smooth feel that holds up to many miles. If you plan to run on different terrains or in inclement weather, the Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is likely the better choice.
Price and Value
The price difference between the two shoes is significant. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX retails at $165.00, while the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 is priced at $49.95, making the latter about 70% less expensive. This stark contrast in price may appeal to budget-conscious buyers who still want a reliable running shoe. However, the Brooks shoe offers advanced technologies and support features that may justify its higher price for serious runners.
Customer Reception
In terms of customer reception, both shoes have ranked well in sales, with the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX holding a sales rank of 22,780 and the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 being slightly more popular at a sales rank of 10,869. This difference suggests that the Cohesion 14 may have a broader appeal for casual runners, while the Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is favored by those who prioritize specific features like waterproofing and support.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX and the Saucony Women's Cohesion 14 ultimately comes down to your running needs and budget. If you require advanced support, waterproof capabilities, and are willing to invest in a high-performance shoe, the Brooks option is worth the higher price tag. However, if you're a casual runner or just starting your running journey and are looking for a budget-friendly option, the Saucony shoe offers excellent value without compromising on comfort.

