vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof vs Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof wins on support and durability, Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 wins on price and weight.

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX excels in support and waterproof features, while the Saucony Triumph 22 offers superior cushioning and affordability.

Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof is better

Support

Brooks provides superior support with Guiderails technology.

Waterproof

Brooks features GORE-TEX for waterproof protection.

Durability

Brooks is designed for various training environments.

Why Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 is better

Price

Saucony is more affordable at $119.95.

Cushioning

Saucony offers plush PWRRUN+ foam for comfort.

Weight

Saucony is lighter due to its engineered mesh upper.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof
85
Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9
75

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX WaterproofSaucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9
Price$165.00$119.95
CushioningDNA LOFT v2PWRRUN+
WaterproofYesNo
Support TypeSupportNeutral
OutsoleGORE-TEXRubber

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX WaterproofSaucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9

Overview

When considering running shoes, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX and the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 Sneaker present two distinct choices for different types of runners. The Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is designed for those needing waterproof protection and support, while the Triumph 22 focuses on plush cushioning and comfort for a neutral running experience. Both shoes cater to specific needs and preferences, making it essential to evaluate their features closely.

Pricing

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is priced at $165.00, while the Saucony Triumph 22 is significantly cheaper at $119.95, making it about 27% less expensive. This price difference could be a deciding factor for budget-conscious shoppers or casual runners who may not need the advanced features of the Brooks model. However, those prioritizing specialized features such as waterproofing and support may find the higher price of the Brooks shoe justified.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort, the Saucony Triumph 22 excels with its premium PWRRUN+ foam, offering maximum cushioning and excellent energy return. This makes it ideal for long runs and all-day wear, appealing to neutral runners seeking plush comfort. On the other hand, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX features DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, which is designed for a smooth and soft ride. While both shoes provide comfort, the Triumph 22 may be more suitable for individuals who prioritize long-distance runs without the need for additional support features.

Support and Stability

Support and stability are crucial for runners, especially for those with specific biomechanical needs. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is equipped with the Guiderails Holistic Support System, which helps to align the body’s natural motion path and control excess movement. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who overpronate or require extra support. In contrast, the Saucony Triumph 22 is categorized as a neutral running shoe, making it less suited for those needing additional support but perfect for runners who prefer a more natural foot strike.

Breathability and Fit

Both shoes prioritize breathability, but they accomplish this in different ways. The Saucony Triumph 22 uses an engineered mesh upper that enhances airflow and adapts to the foot, which helps reduce irritation during runs. Meanwhile, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX features an engineered Air Mesh and 3D Fit Print technology, providing a flexible and structured fit. While both models aim to enhance comfort through breathability, the Triumph 22 may be better for those seeking a lightweight option for warmer weather.

Durability and Traction

Durability is essential for running shoes, and both models have features that cater to this need. The Saucony Triumph 22 includes a high-abrasion rubber outsole that promises long-lasting durability and dependable traction, making it suitable for various surfaces like pavement and treadmills. Conversely, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is designed for road running and cross-training, with the GORE-TEX Invisible Fit providing waterproof protection. While both shoes are built to last, the choice may depend on the runner’s typical environment and whether waterproofing is a priority.

Aesthetic Appeal

Aesthetic appeal can significantly influence a buyer's decision. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is offered in a striking color combination of Black, Knockout Pink, and Aqua, which may attract those looking for stylish yet functional footwear. The Saucony Triumph 22, available in a Vapor/Moon colorway, presents a more subdued, modern look. Ultimately, the choice here comes down to personal preference regarding style, as both shoes offer contemporary designs suited for athletic wear.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the decision between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX and the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 Sneaker hinges on individual needs and preferences. The Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is ideal for runners seeking robust support, waterproof features, and a smooth ride, albeit at a higher price point. In contrast, the Triumph 22 stands out for its plush cushioning and affordability, making it suitable for neutral runners or those prioritizing comfort over specialized support. Consider your running style, environment, and budget carefully to choose the right shoe for your needs.