Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof vs Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof wins on comfort and support, Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, wins on weight and breathability.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 offers superior support and waterproof features, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Under Armour Women’s Charged Surge 4 is a budget-friendly option for casual use.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof is better
Support
Brooks provides advanced support features.
Waterproof
Brooks has waterproof protection.
Cushioning
Brooks uses DNA LOFT v2 cushioning for comfort.
Why Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, is better
Price
Under Armour is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Under Armour is lighter.
Versatility
Under Armour is suitable for casual use.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof | Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Under Armour |
| Model | Adrenaline GTS 23 | Charged Surge 4 |
| Waterproof | Yes | No |
| Cushioning | DNA LOFT v2 | Charged Cushioning |
| Bestseller Rank | 22780 | 2697 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 and Under Armour Women’s Charged Surge 4
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 is a premium running shoe priced at $165.00, while the Under Armour Women’s Charged Surge 4 is significantly more budget-friendly at $51.95, making it about 68% cheaper. Each shoe targets a different type of runner with distinct features and benefits, which may influence your purchasing decision.
Design and Aesthetics
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 features a sleek design with a color scheme of black, knockout pink, and aqua, which appeals to those who prefer a more refined look. In contrast, the Under Armour Women’s Charged Surge 4 boasts a bright white base accented with distant gray and metallic silver, presenting a more sporty and vibrant appearance. The visual appeal of each shoe is subjective, but the premium aesthetics of the Brooks might attract runners looking for something stylish yet functional.
Comfort and Fit
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 is engineered with a GORE-TEX Invisible Fit that ensures a light and flexible fit while providing waterproof protection. This shoe also incorporates DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, which enhances the soft ride and overall comfort. On the other hand, the Under Armour Women’s Charged Surge 4 offers a breathable mesh upper with synthetic overlays for added support. Enhanced cushioning around the ankle collar provides superior comfort, making both shoes suitable for long runs. However, the Brooks shoe is designed specifically for those needing extra support, thanks to its Guiderails Holistic Support System, making it ideal for runners with specific motion control needs.
Performance and Support
In terms of performance, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 is tailored for runners who require additional support and stability, making it a great choice for road running and cross-training. Its bestseller rank of 22,780 reflects its popularity among serious runners. The Under Armour Women’s Charged Surge 4, with a bestseller rank of 2,697, offers a neutral experience for runners seeking a balance of flexibility and cushioning. The Charged Cushioning midsole provides responsiveness, making it a solid option for those who prefer a lighter shoe without sacrificing comfort.
Price Comparison
The price difference between these two models is significant, with the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 retailing at $165.00 compared to the Under Armour Women’s Charged Surge 4 at $51.95. This makes the Under Armour shoe approximately 68% less expensive than the Brooks model. While the Brooks may offer more advanced features and support, the Under Armour model provides a budget-friendly alternative for runners who prioritize affordability without compromising too much on comfort.
Durability and Construction
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 is built with durable materials designed to withstand various weather conditions, featuring waterproof protection that is particularly useful for runners in wet climates. Its engineered air mesh construction is complemented by 3D Fit Print technology, enhancing the shoe's overall structure and fit. In comparison, the Under Armour Women’s Charged Surge 4 is designed with a durable rubber outsole, ensuring traction and flexibility for toe-off. While both shoes are constructed for durability, the Brooks model is specifically focused on providing a resilient option for runners who face challenging weather conditions.
User Experience and Feedback
Reviews for the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 often highlight its superior support and comfort, especially for those with specific foot needs, including diabetic conditions, as it is a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe. The Under Armour Women’s Charged Surge 4 receives praise for its comfort and lightweight feel, making it a great option for casual runners or those who prioritize ease of wear. User experiences reveal that the Brooks model is favored among serious athletes, while the Under Armour shoe is appreciated by those looking for a versatile shoe for everyday use.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 and the Under Armour Women’s Charged Surge 4 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you require advanced support, waterproof features, and are willing to invest in a premium shoe, the Brooks model is the clear winner. However, if you are looking for a comfortable, stylish, and budget-friendly option for casual running or workouts, the Under Armour shoe offers excellent value at $51.95. Each shoe serves its purpose well, so consider your running habits and preferences before making a decision.

