Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & wins on support and comfort, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running wins on style and durability.
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 excels in support and comfort, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav offers affordability and versatility.
Why Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & is better
Support
Brooks features GuideRails technology for superior support.
Cushioning
Brooks uses nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 for enhanced comfort.
Durability
Brooks has a linear last construction for long-lasting performance.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running is better
Price
New Balance is priced at $79.99, significantly lower than Brooks.
Popularity
New Balance has a better sales rank of 2101.
Fit
New Balance offers a snug bootie construction for a secure feel.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | New Balance |
| Model | Ariel GTS 24 | Fresh Foam Roav |
| Price | $119.95 | $79.99 |
| Sales Rank | 3616 | 2101 |
| Cushion Type | DNA Loft v3 | Fresh Foam |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 is priced at $119.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav is significantly cheaper at $79.99, making it about 33% less expensive. Given that the Brooks shoe has an average price of $147.98 over the last 90 days, it's clear that the New Balance option offers a more budget-friendly choice without sacrificing quality. For runners looking to save money, the New Balance shoe stands out as the more economical option.
Comfort and Cushioning
Both shoes prioritize comfort, but they achieve it through different technologies. The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which is designed to provide soft, durable support tailored to your unique stride. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav utilizes a fresh foam midsole that promises plush cushioning and absorbs impact effectively. While both shoes offer commendable comfort, the Brooks model may appeal more to those who seek maximum support for longer runs, whereas the New Balance shoe is ideal for casual wear and shorter runs.
Support Features
Support is a crucial consideration for runners, and here, the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 takes the lead with its GuideRails holistic support system. This technology helps keep you in your natural motion path, effectively limiting excess joint movement. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav, while also supportive, utilizes an Ultra Heel design that provides targeted support for a secure fit. If you prioritize advanced support features to maintain proper alignment during your runs, the Brooks shoe is likely the better choice.
Fit and Design
In terms of fit, the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 offers a generous and roomy upper, designed for increased comfort and performance. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav features a bootie construction that wraps around the foot for a sock-like feel. While both shoes aim for comfort, the Brooks model is tailored for those who prefer a more spacious fit, while the New Balance emphasizes a snug, secure fit. This difference in design could greatly influence your choice based on personal comfort preferences.
Durability
Durability is a key factor for any running shoe, and both models provide reliable options. The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 is engineered with a linear last construction that enhances support and stability, contributing to its long-lasting performance. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav incorporates NDurance outsole technology, designed to withstand both road miles and daily wear. Although both shoes are built to last, the Brooks may offer slightly more durability for serious runners who log extensive miles.
Sales Rank and Popularity
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav enjoys a better sales rank of 2101, compared to the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24, which ranks at 3616. This suggests that the New Balance model is more popular among consumers, possibly due to its lower price point and versatile design. While sales rank isn't the sole indicator of quality, it does reflect consumer preference, making the New Balance a compelling option for those looking for a well-regarded product.
Brand Reputation
Both Brooks and New Balance are reputable brands in the running shoe market, but they cater to slightly different audiences. Brooks is well-known for its focus on support and comfort, especially for runners who need extra stability. The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24, with its PDAC A5500 certification and APMA Seal of Acceptance, is particularly appealing for individuals requiring therapeutic footwear. New Balance, however, is recognized for its innovative designs and affordability, offering quality running shoes that attract a broader audience. Depending on your brand loyalty and specific needs, either shoe could be a great fit.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the choice between the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav largely depends on your personal running needs and budget. If you are looking for maximum support and comfort for serious runs, the Brooks model is an excellent choice, despite its higher price point of $119.95. However, if affordability and versatility are your top priorities, the New Balance shoe at $79.99 offers great value with comfort and durability suitable for daily wear. Ultimately, both shoes have their strengths, so consider what features matter most to you before making a decision.

