Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & vs Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes,
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & wins on comfort and support, Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, wins on style and value.
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 offers superior support and comfort, while the Nike Women’s Run Swift 3 is a more budget-friendly option. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & is better
Support
Brooks provides superior stability with GuideRails technology.
Cushioning
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning.
Fit
Brooks offers a roomy fit for added comfort.
Why Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, is better
Price
Nike is $34.95 cheaper than Brooks.
Weight
Nike is likely lighter, appealing to speed-focused runners.
Popularity
Nike has a higher bestseller rank.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & | Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Nike |
| Current Price | $119.95 | $85.00 |
| Sales Rank | 3616 | 1650 |
| Cushion Type | DNA LOFT v3 | Foam |
| Support Tech | GuideRails | Flywire |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 is priced at $119.95, whereas the Nike Women’s Run Swift 3 is significantly cheaper at $85.00. This translates to a price difference of $34.95, making the Nike option about 29% less expensive than the Brooks model. For budget-conscious consumers, the price point of the Nike shoe may be more appealing, especially given that it still offers essential features for running and walking.
Brand Reputation
Brooks is known for its focus on comfort and support in running footwear, which is reflected in the Ariel GTS 24's features, including nitrogen-infused cushioning and GuideRails technology. This shoe has a bestseller rank of 3,616, indicating solid popularity among buyers. On the other hand, Nike has a broader appeal and is recognized for innovative designs and athletic performance. The Nike Women’s Run Swift 3 has a higher bestseller rank of 1,650, suggesting a strong preference among consumers for this particular model.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 excels with its nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, which adapts to individual strides, providing a soft and durable feel. The shoe is designed for maximum support, making it a favorite among runners and walkers. In contrast, the Nike Women’s Run Swift 3 also offers foam cushioning, but it emphasizes a plush underfoot sensation with a higher foam height. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks model is engineered for those seeking maximum support, whereas the Nike variant may be better for casual runners looking for a softer feel.
Support and Stability
Support is a standout feature of the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24, thanks to its GuideRails holistic support system, which helps to maintain natural motion while minimizing excess movement. This shoe is particularly suitable for individuals who require additional stability during their runs or walks. The Nike Women’s Run Swift 3, while providing support through Flywire cables, does not offer the same level of stability as the Brooks model. For runners with specific support needs, the Brooks shoe is likely the superior choice.
Fit and Design
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 is designed with a roomy fit, which accommodates various foot shapes and provides added comfort. The engineered upper enhances softness and lockdown for performance. Conversely, the Nike Women’s Run Swift 3 features a heel overlay for added security, but does not emphasize a roomy fit in the same way. The choice between these two shoes may come down to individual preferences regarding fit, with the Brooks likely catering to those who prioritize comfort and space.
Weight and Performance
Weight can significantly impact performance, particularly for runners. The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 is built with durable materials aimed at providing support, which may result in a slightly heavier shoe compared to the Nike Women’s Run Swift 3. The lighter construction of the Nike shoe may appeal to runners looking for speed and agility. However, the Brooks model compensates for any added weight with superior support and cushioning, making it a great choice for longer runs or walks.
Durability
Both shoes are designed to withstand regular use, but their approaches to durability differ. The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 features resilient cushioning that adapts to the wearer’s unique stride, indicating a long-lasting performance. The Nike Women’s Run Swift 3, while also well-constructed, focuses more on providing a soft underfoot feel than on heavy-duty durability. For those prioritizing longevity in their footwear, the Brooks model may offer an edge, especially with its emphasis on support and comfort in extended wear.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 and the Nike Women’s Run Swift 3 depends largely on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize maximum support, comfort, and durability for walking or running, the Brooks model, with its price of $119.95, is likely the better choice. However, if you’re looking for a more budget-friendly option that still delivers good performance, the Nike shoe at $85.00 offers a solid alternative. Ultimately, your decision may hinge on whether you value additional support and features over a lower price point.

