Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & vs Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & wins on support and stability, Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 wins on breathability and weight.
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 excels in support and stability, while the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 offers plush cushioning for neutral runners. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & is better
Support
Ariel GTS 24 provides maximum support for runners.
Stability
GuideRails technology enhances stability.
Sales Rank
Ariel GTS 24 has a better sales rank.
Why Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 is better
Cushioning
Triumph 22 offers plush cushioning.
Breathability
Triumph 22 features a breathable mesh upper.
Weight
Triumph 22 is likely lighter for long runs.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & | Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $119.95 | $119.95 |
| Sales Rank | 3616 | 34383 |
| Cushion Type | DNA LOFT v3 | PWRRUN+ |
| Upper Material | Engineered | Mesh |
| Target Audience | Support Seekers | Neutral Runners |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 and Saucony Women’s Triumph 22
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 is designed for maximum support and comfort, making it a favorite among runners and walkers. In contrast, the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 emphasizes plush cushioning and smooth transitions for neutral runners. Both shoes are priced at $119.95, but they cater to somewhat different audiences within the running community.
Comfort and Cushioning
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 excels in providing soft, nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, which adapts uniquely to each stride for durable comfort. This feature is particularly beneficial for those who prioritize support during their runs or walks. On the other hand, the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 utilizes premium PWRRUN+ foam, delivering maximum cushioning and excellent energy return. This shoe aims to provide a plush experience, making it an excellent choice for long runs and all-day wear. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Ariel GTS 24 leans more towards support, while the Triumph 22 focuses on a luxury cushioning experience.
Stability and Support
When it comes to stability, the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 shines with its GuideRails holistic support system. This technology helps manage excess movement, allowing for a natural motion path and reducing joint strain. Its linear last construction further enhances stability, making it a solid pick for runners who need extra support. The Saucony Women’s Triumph 22, however, is designed as a neutral running shoe, which may not offer the same level of support for overpronators. Instead, it provides a wide, stable platform for smooth transitions, ideal for neutral runners seeking a comfortable ride.
Breathability and Fit
The Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 features a breathable engineered mesh upper that enhances airflow and adapts to the foot for a secure fit. This design reduces hotspots and irritation, making it suitable for extended wear. In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 also includes an engineered upper, but its focus is more on a roomy fit that prioritizes comfort and lockdown during performance. While both shoes provide a comfortable fit, the Triumph 22 may be better for those who sweat easily and need breathability.
Weight and Performance
Weight can significantly impact a runner's performance, and both shoes have their distinct advantages. The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 is engineered for maximum support, which may come with a slight weight penalty, but it compensates with its cushioning and stability features. The Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 is likely lighter due to its focus on a more neutral running experience, making it easier to wear over long distances. However, specific weights are not provided, so potential buyers may want to consider how each shoe feels during a test run.
Style and Aesthetics
In terms of style, both shoes offer appealing designs that cater to different tastes. The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 comes in a Coconut/Chateau/Portabella colorway, which gives it a fresh and sophisticated look. On the other hand, the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 in Vapor/Moon presents a modern and sleek aesthetic. Style can be subjective, but both shoes are designed to not only perform well but also look good while doing so.
Price Comparison
Both the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 and the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 are priced identically at $119.95. This price point positions both shoes within the mid-range market for running footwear, making them accessible options for serious runners and casual users alike. The average price over the last 90 days shows that the Ariel GTS 24 has fluctuated to around $147.98, indicating it may have previously been seen as a higher-value option. Conversely, the Triumph 22’s average price is about $119.94, suggesting it has remained stable.
Sales Rank and Popularity
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 has a sales rank of 3,616, indicating it is relatively popular among buyers. In comparison, the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 holds a sales rank of 34,383, which may suggest it is less frequently purchased. This difference in rank may reflect the specific target markets each shoe aims for, with the Ariel GTS 24 appealing more to those who prioritize support and stability.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 and the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you require maximum support and stability for walking or running, the Ariel GTS 24 is the better option. However, if you prefer plush cushioning and a neutral running experience, the Triumph 22 might be the perfect fit. Both shoes are competitively priced at $119.95, but they cater to different preferences, making it essential to consider what features matter most to you before making a decision.

