vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral vs Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, Mirage/Citron, 8

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral wins on weatherproof and durability, Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, Mirage/Citron, 8 wins on weight.

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized offers better comfort and value, while the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4 excels in speed and performance.

Why Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral is better

Price

Brooks is $27.43 cheaper

Comfort

Brooks has superior cushioning for long runs

Weatherproof

Brooks features a weather-resistant design

Why Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, Mirage/Citron, 8 is better

Performance

Saucony is designed for race day speed

Lightweight

Saucony is lighter for faster runs

Carbon Plate

Saucony includes a carbon plate for propulsion

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral
85
Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, Mirage/Citron, 8
78

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized NeutralSaucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, Mirage/Citron, 8
Cushion TypeDNA Loft v3PWRRUN PB
Support TypeNeutralPerformance
Upper MaterialDWR MeshSynthetic
Weight (oz)108.5
Best ForAll WeatherRace Day

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized NeutralSaucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, Mirage/Citron, 8

Overview of the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized and Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized is priced at $103.23, making it about 21% cheaper than the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4, which retails for $130.66. Both shoes cater to different running needs, with the Brooks model focusing on comfort and weather resistance, while the Saucony emphasizes speed and performance.

Design and Aesthetics

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized features a sleek design in Almond Peach/Coconut, highlighting its weather-ready capabilities. In contrast, the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4 comes in a vibrant Mirage/Citron color scheme, appealing to those looking for a bold racing aesthetic. Both designs reflect their brands' dedication to style and functionality, but the Brooks model is more utilitarian, prioritizing weatherproof features over flashy aesthetics.

Comfort and Cushioning

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized is equipped with nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which provides a soft and responsive feel. This cushioning is ideal for long runs, ensuring comfort over various distances. On the other hand, the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4 is built for speed, featuring PWRRUN PB cushioning that delivers a snappier response for race day performance. While both shoes offer impressive comfort, the Brooks model excels in providing a plush experience, making it more suitable for everyday runners.

Performance and Support

When it comes to performance, the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4 is designed for those seeking a competitive edge, featuring a carbon plate that enhances propulsion and speed. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized offers neutral support, making it a great choice for runners who prefer a natural stride. The Brooks shoe also boasts a segmented crash pad for smooth transitions, allowing for distraction-free running. While the Saucony excels in race performance, the Brooks shines in versatility and comfort.

Traction and Durability

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized is designed with an all-weather outsole that provides enhanced wet/dry traction. This feature ensures stability and confidence on various surfaces, making it a reliable choice for unpredictable weather conditions. Meanwhile, the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4, while lighter and faster, is primarily focused on race day scenarios. Its traction is optimized for road surfaces, which may not hold up as well in adverse conditions compared to the Brooks model.

Pricing and Value

With a current price of $103.23, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized offers significant value, especially considering its features geared towards all-weather running. In contrast, the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4, priced at $130.66, is targeted towards serious runners looking for a performance edge. The price difference of about $27.43 makes the Brooks model a more appealing option for casual runners or those on a budget, without sacrificing essential features.

Bestseller Rankings

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized holds a sales rank of 5547, while the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4 is ranked at 13551. This indicates that the Brooks model is more popular among consumers, likely due to its combination of comfort, weather resistance, and affordability. The higher sales rank of the Brooks shoe suggests that it has resonated better with a wider audience, making it a trusted choice for many runners.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized and the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4 depends on your specific running needs. If you prioritize comfort, versatility, and weather resistance at a lower price point, the Brooks model is the clear winner. However, if you are a competitive runner seeking speed and performance on race day, the Saucony could be the better fit despite its higher price. Consider your running style, environment, and budget when making your decision.