Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - vs Hoka Women's Bondi 9 Black/White 8 Medium
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on price and comfort, Hoka Women's Bondi 9 Black/White 8 Medium wins on popularity and cushioning.
The Brooks Glycerin 21 offers excellent value and comfort at a lower price, while the Hoka Bondi 9 excels in maximal cushioning for those willing to invest more.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Glycerin 21 is $114.95, Bondi 9 is $165.22
Sales Rank
Glycerin 21 ranks 29,881, Bondi 9 ranks 3,046
Comfort
Glycerin 21 features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning
Why Hoka Women's Bondi 9 Black/White 8 Medium is better
Cushioning
Bondi 9 offers maximal cushioning with a premium foam midsole
Popularity
Bondi 9 has a higher bestseller rank
Design
Bondi 9 features a modern structured knit upper
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - | Hoka Women's Bondi 9 Black/White 8 Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | HOKA |
| Current Price | $114.95 | $165.22 |
| Sales Rank | 29,881 | 3,046 |
| Cushion Type | DNA Loft v3 | Premium Foam |
| Upper Material | Warp Knit | Engineered Mesh |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 is about 30% cheaper than the Hoka Women's Bondi 9. The Glycerin 21 is priced at $114.95, while the Bondi 9 costs $165.22. This significant price difference makes the Glycerin 21 a more budget-friendly option for runners who are looking for quality without breaking the bank. While the Bondi 9 offers premium features and cushioning, the Glycerin 21 provides excellent value at a lower price point, making it a compelling choice for those who want to save money while still getting a reliable running shoe.
Brand Reputation
Both Brooks and Hoka have strong reputations in the running shoe market, but they cater to slightly different audiences. Brooks is often recognized for its commitment to comfort and support, which is highlighted by the Glycerin 21 receiving the APMA Seal of Acceptance. On the other hand, Hoka is known for its maximalist cushioning, as seen in the Bondi 9, which appeals to runners who prioritize plushness during their runs. While Brooks ranks 29,881 in bestseller rank, Hoka's Bondi 9 is much higher at 3,046, indicating a strong preference for Hoka's offerings among consumers. This suggests that while both brands have loyal followings, Hoka may have a slight edge in current popularity.
Comfort and Cushioning
The comfort and cushioning of both shoes are standout features, but they cater to different preferences. The Brooks Glycerin 21 provides super-soft cushioning with its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 technology, which optimizes the shoe for lightweight responsiveness. This makes it ideal for runners seeking a plush experience during their workouts. On the other hand, the Hoka Bondi 9 is engineered for peak plushness, featuring a new premium foam midsole and increased stack height. This design is perfect for runners who want a softer and more resilient ride. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on whether a runner prefers the soft responsiveness of the Glycerin 21 or the maximal cushioning of the Bondi 9.
Design and Aesthetics
The aesthetics of a running shoe can be just as important as its performance features. The Brooks Glycerin 21 comes in a sleek black, grey, and white color scheme, making it versatile for various outfits. Its design incorporates a breathable, warp-knit upper that allows for flexible movement, ensuring a comfortable fit. Conversely, the Hoka Bondi 9 is available in a striking black and white design, which also boasts a structured knit upper. This shoe features a 3D molded collar for added support and style. Both options are visually appealing, but runners may lean towards the Glycerin 21 for its understated elegance or the Bondi 9 for its more modern, bold look.
Fit and Sizing
Fit is crucial when selecting a running shoe, and both the Brooks Glycerin 21 and Hoka Bondi 9 offer unique fits that cater to different foot shapes. The Glycerin 21 features a plush internal stretch bootie that surrounds the foot, providing a snug yet accommodating fit. This is particularly beneficial for runners who prioritize a secure feel during their runs. In contrast, the Bondi 9 is designed to deliver a soft and structured fit, enhanced by its zonal breathability. While both shoes aim to provide comfort and support, the Glycerin 21 may appeal more to those who prefer a more flexible fit compared to the structured support of the Bondi 9.
Performance on Different Surfaces
Both the Brooks Glycerin 21 and Hoka Bondi 9 are designed for running, but they perform differently on various surfaces. The Glycerin 21 is ideal for road running, cross-training, and gym workouts, thanks to its neutral support and maximum cushioning. This versatility makes it a great option for runners who enjoy mixing up their training environments. The Bondi 9, while also suitable for road running, excels in providing comfort for long-distance runs and everyday wear, making it a favorite for those who prioritize plushness over versatility. Runners should consider where they will use the shoes most frequently when making their choice.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, your choice between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 and the Hoka Women's Bondi 9 will largely depend on your specific needs and preferences. If you are looking for a more budget-friendly option that does not sacrifice comfort, the Glycerin 21 is the clear winner at $114.95. However, if you prioritize maximal cushioning and are willing to invest more for those features, the Bondi 9, priced at $165.22, could be the right fit for you. Both shoes offer unique benefits, so consider what aspects are most important for your running experience before making a decision.

