Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral leads on fit and comfort.
The Brooks shoe offers superior cushioning and support for serious runners, while the New Balance shoe is a budget-friendly option for everyday use.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral is better
Cushioning
Brooks features advanced DNA Tuned cushioning.
Support
Brooks provides better stability and support.
Performance
Brooks is designed for serious runners.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is better
Price
New Balance is significantly cheaper.
Versatility
New Balance is suitable for casual use.
Popularity
New Balance has a better sales rank.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | New Balance |
| Model | Glycerin 22 | Fresh Foam 680 V8 |
| Cushion Type | DNA Tuned | Fresh Foam |
| Upper | Flat Knit | Knit |
| Drop | Not Specified | 8 mm |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is significantly more affordable, priced at $69.99, compared to the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22, which retails for $114.95. This means that the New Balance shoe is about 39% cheaper than its counterpart. For budget-conscious buyers, the New Balance option presents a compelling choice without sacrificing essential features. Meanwhile, the Brooks shoe, while more expensive, offers premium technology that may justify its higher price for serious runners.
Comfort and Cushioning
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 is designed with DNA Tuned cushioning, which provides a plush landing and energetic toe-off. This advanced cushioning technology is aimed at delivering smooth transitions, making it ideal for both road running and cross-training. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 features Fresh Foam midsole cushioning that also prioritizes comfort but is specifically tailored for lightweight rides. While both shoes excel in comfort, the Brooks shoe's cushioning technology is geared toward a more luxurious running experience, making it suitable for those who prioritize plushness in their footwear.
Support and Fit
For those seeking support, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 offers neutral support with a broad platform that stabilizes the foot. Its accommodating fit is enhanced by an updated flat knit upper that adapts to the foot's movements. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8, while also designed for comfort, features a precision-engineered knit upper but lacks the same level of support offered by Brooks. Thus, runners requiring more stability during their runs may find the Brooks option to be the better choice.
Versatility
Both shoes are versatile enough for various activities, though they cater to slightly different needs. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 is suitable for road running, cross-training, and gym workouts, making it a well-rounded choice for serious athletes. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8, on the other hand, is excellent for everyday runs, workouts, and even casual errands. Its design focuses on durability and comfort for a wide range of activities, appealing to those who value a multi-functional shoe.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, both shoes have their unique appeal. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 features a sleek, adaptable upper with a color scheme of white, grey, and black, which gives it a modern look. This shoe's aesthetic is designed to blend into both running and casual settings seamlessly. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 also boasts a contemporary design, emphasizing a no-sew upper for a sleek fit. While both shoes are visually appealing, the choice may come down to personal preference regarding color and style.
Sales Rank and Popularity
In terms of sales rank, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 has a rank of 14,424, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 ranks slightly better at 13,745. This indicates that the New Balance shoe is currently more popular among consumers, possibly due to its lower price point and versatile design. However, the Brooks shoe remains a strong contender in the market, especially among those who prioritize high-performance features over cost.
Intended Use
The intended use of each shoe plays a significant role in their overall effectiveness. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 is specifically designed for serious runners who require a high level of cushioning and support, making it ideal for long-distance runs and intensive workouts. Conversely, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 is built for everyday runners and those looking for a reliable shoe for various activities, including walking and casual outings. Understanding the intended use can help buyers make a more informed decision based on their individual needs.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the choice between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 ultimately hinges on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a high-performance running shoe with advanced cushioning and support, the Brooks option may be worth the investment at $114.95. However, if you are seeking a more budget-friendly option that still delivers comfort and versatility for everyday use, the New Balance shoe at $69.99 is an excellent choice. Each shoe offers unique benefits, so consider your running habits and preferences carefully before making a decision.

