Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral vs Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral wins on support and fit, Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, wins on breathability and versatility.
The Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 offers superior cushioning and comfort, while the Under Armour Charged Assert 10 is a more budget-friendly and versatile option.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral is better
Cushioning
Advanced DNA Tuned cushioning for plush comfort.
Comfort
Accommodating fit with a soft, flat knit upper.
Performance
Optimized for longer runs with smooth transitions.
Why Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, is better
Price
Significantly cheaper at $54.95.
Weight
Lightweight at 8.9 ounces for speed.
Versatility
Designed for various activities beyond running.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral | Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Under Armour |
| Model | Glycerin Stealthfit 22 | Charged Assert 10 |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral |
| Upper | Flat knit | Mesh |
| Midsole | DNA Tuned | Charged Cushioning |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is significantly cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22. Priced at $54.95, the Under Armour shoe is about 52% less expensive than the Brooks shoe, which retails for $114.95. This price difference may appeal to budget-conscious buyers looking for reliable running shoes without breaking the bank. The Glycerin Stealthfit 22, while priced higher, justifies its cost with advanced features aimed at serious runners.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, both shoes deliver distinct aesthetics suitable for their respective target audiences. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 features a sleek and adaptable upper in a white, grey, and black colorway. Its updated flat knit upper not only looks modern but also promises maximum comfort. On the other hand, the Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 10 sports a classic black-on-black design with white accents, appealing to those who prefer a more understated look. Each shoe's design complements its intended use, whether it’s the Glycerin’s sporty elegance or the Assert’s no-nonsense approach.
Comfort and Fit
The comfort and fit of a running shoe can make or break your experience, and both options excel in this area but in different ways. The Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 offers an accommodating fit with its soft, flat knit upper that blends stretch and compression, providing a natural feel while running. This shoe is designed for those who appreciate a plush, cushioned experience. Conversely, the Under Armour Charged Assert 10 boasts a lightweight, breathable mesh upper designed for flexibility and support, making it suitable for various activities. While both shoes cater to comfort, the Glycerin emphasizes cushioning, while the Assert focuses on versatility.
Cushioning Technology
Cushioning technology is a critical aspect of running shoes, and each model utilizes its unique approach. The Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 features DNA Tuned cushioning, which combines larger cells in the heel for soft landings and smaller cells in the forefoot for responsive toe-offs. This technology aims to enhance the overall running experience, particularly for road runners and cross-trainers. In contrast, the Under Armour Charged Assert 10 employs Charged Cushioning, a compression-molded foam that provides responsiveness and durability. While both shoes offer neutral support, the Glycerin is more focused on plush comfort, whereas the Assert delivers a balance of comfort and performance.
Durability and Build Quality
When it comes to durability, the construction of both shoes reflects their intended use. The Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 is built with a focus on smooth transitions and stability, thanks to its broad platform and advanced cushioning technology. This durability is ideal for runners who log many miles. On the flip side, the Under Armour Charged Assert 10 features a solid rubber outsole that covers high impact zones, ensuring it withstands wear and tear while remaining lightweight. Both shoes prioritize durability, but the Glycerin leans towards plush comfort, while the Assert offers a more robust design for varied activities.
Performance
In terms of performance, both shoes cater to neutral runners but excel in different areas. The Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22, with its advanced DNA Tuned cushioning, is optimized for smooth transitions and plush comfort, making it ideal for longer runs or intensive training. Its sales rank of 14,424 indicates a respectable level of popularity among runners. Meanwhile, the Under Armour Charged Assert 10, with its responsive Charged Cushioning, is designed for runners who value versatility and flexibility, as reflected in its lower sales rank of 5,952, suggesting it appeals to a broader audience. Each shoe offers a unique performance experience tailored to the needs of different types of runners.
Weight
Weight can significantly impact running efficiency, and here, the Under Armour Charged Assert 10 has the upper hand. Weighing in at just 8.9 ounces, this shoe is designed for those who prefer a lightweight option for speed and agility. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 does not specify its weight but is generally known to provide a more cushioned feel that may come with additional heft. For runners focused on speed and minimalism, the Assert could be the preferable choice.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 and the Under Armour Women’s Charged Assert 10 ultimately comes down to your individual needs and budget. If you prioritize advanced cushioning, plush comfort, and are willing to invest in a higher-end shoe, the Glycerin Stealthfit 22 may be the best fit for you. However, if you’re looking for a more affordable option that offers versatility and a lightweight feel, the Charged Assert 10 is likely the better choice. Both shoes have their merits, catering to different types of runners and preferences.

