Canon EF 75- vs Viltrox

Overview of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III and Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E

When comparing the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens and the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E, it’s essential to note their distinct purposes and design philosophies. The Canon lens, priced at $199.99, is designed for capturing distant subjects, making it ideal for sports and wildlife photography, while the Viltrox lens, available for $179.00, excels in portraiture and low-light photography. This price difference of about 10% makes the Viltrox a more budget-friendly option for those who prioritize portrait photography.

Design and Build Quality

In terms of design, the Canon EF 75-300mm features a robust construction tailored for SLR cameras, measuring 2.8 inches in diameter and 4.8 inches long. It weighs 16.8 ounces, which can be considered somewhat hefty for extended use. Conversely, the Viltrox 35mm, which weighs only 170 grams, is lightweight and compact, making it highly portable for everyday use and travel. This stark contrast in weight and size reflects their intended use cases, with the Viltrox offering a user-friendly experience for photographers on the go.

Focal Length and Versatility

The focal lengths of these lenses are quite different, impacting their versatility. The Canon EF 75-300mm provides a broad zoom range from 75mm to 300mm, allowing photographers to capture subjects from a distance, whether it’s a sporting event or wildlife. This lens is particularly advantageous for those who require flexibility in framing their shots without needing to change lenses frequently. In comparison, the Viltrox 35mm offers a prime focal length suitable for portraits, landscapes, and street photography. It provides a 35mm equivalent focal length on APS-C cameras, which is optimal for various creative needs but lacks the zoom versatility of the Canon lens.

Aperture Performance

When it comes to maximum aperture, the Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 takes the lead with a bright aperture that allows for excellent performance in low-light conditions and greater depth of field control. This makes it ideal for portrait photography, where background blur can enhance the subject's prominence. In contrast, the Canon EF 75-300mm has a maximum aperture of f/4-5.6, which is adequate for general photography but limits its low-light capabilities significantly. The lens's lack of image stabilization further emphasizes the importance of lighting conditions when using it.

Autofocus and Usability

Autofocus performance is another critical aspect where these lenses differ. The Canon EF 75-300mm utilizes a DC motor for autofocus, which while functional, may not be as quick or quiet as more advanced systems. In contrast, the Viltrox 35mm features near-silent autofocus, making it perfect for situations where discretion is needed, such as candid portrait shooting or video recording. This technological edge makes the Viltrox a more appealing choice for videographers and content creators using mirrorless cameras.

Price Comparison

The Canon EF 75-300mm is currently priced at $199.99, while the Viltrox 35mm is more budget-friendly at $179.00. This price difference of about $20 means that the Viltrox is approximately 10% cheaper than the Canon lens. For photographers who are looking to maximize their budget without sacrificing quality, the Viltrox offers an excellent option, especially for those who primarily shoot in scenarios where a prime lens excels.

Ideal Use Cases

Choosing between these lenses largely depends on the photographer's needs and shooting style. The Canon EF 75-300mm is ideal for those who frequently shoot distant subjects, such as wildlife or sports, thanks to its extensive zoom range. It is a versatile lens for capturing various types of scenes. On the other hand, the Viltrox 35mm is better suited for portrait photographers and those who often work in low-light environments. Its lightweight design and fast aperture make it a go-to for creative and spontaneous photography.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, the decision between the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III and the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E hinges on your photography style. If you require a versatile zoom lens for distant subjects, the Canon is a solid choice despite its higher price and lower low-light performance. However, if you prefer a lightweight lens for portraits and low-light situations, the Viltrox is the better option, offering excellent value for money. Ultimately, both lenses serve their distinct purposes well, catering to different types of photographers and their respective needs.