New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe vs Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker, Mist/Indigo, 10
Updated August 2026 — New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe wins on price and design, Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker, Mist/Indigo, 10 wins on breathability.
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 offers superior cushioning and a sleek design, while the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 is more budget-friendly with excellent breathability.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is better
Cushioning
Fresh Foam technology provides a softer ride
Design
Sleek upper design with no-sew construction
Brand Reputation
Higher bestseller rank indicates stronger consumer trust
Why Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker, Mist/Indigo, 10 is better
Price
Saucony model is about 22% cheaper
Breathability
Light and breathable mesh upper
Weight
Designed for a smooth transition and comfort
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe | Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker, Mist/Indigo, 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cushion Type | Fresh Foam | VERSARUN |
| Upper Material | Knit | Mesh |
| Outsole | Rubber | Rubber |
| Drop | 8 mm | Not specified |
| Sales Rank | 13745 | 22129 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is priced at $69.99, while the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker comes in at $54.63, making the Saucony model about 22% cheaper. This price difference could be significant for budget-conscious consumers looking for quality running shoes. The Fresh Foam 680 V8 is a bit more expensive but may justify the higher cost with its advanced features and brand reputation. Both shoes offer solid performance, but if price is your primary concern, the Saucony model offers a more economical choice.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is paramount when choosing running shoes, and both models excel in this area. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 features a Fresh Foam midsole that provides an ultra-cushioned ride, designed to absorb impact effectively during runs. In contrast, the Saucony Cohesion 16 utilizes VERSARUN cushioning, which also absorbs impact and reduces pressure for comfortable strides. While both shoes offer excellent cushioning, the Fresh Foam technology may provide a softer, more plush experience, whereas the VERSARUN may be better suited for those who prefer a firmer feel. Ultimately, your choice might depend on your personal comfort preference during runs.
Upper Design and Breathability
The upper design of a running shoe can greatly affect both comfort and breathability. The Fresh Foam 680 V8 boasts a precision-engineered knit upper that promotes ventilation and comfort, while its no-sew construction offers a sleek fit. On the other hand, the Saucony Cohesion 16 features a light and breathable mesh upper that helps keep your feet cool and fresh during runs. If you prioritize a sleek fit with targeted ventilation, the New Balance model may be the right choice for you. Conversely, if breathability is your main concern, the Saucony's mesh upper may offer the comfort you seek.
Durability and Outsole Performance
When considering long-term wear, the durability of the outsole is crucial. The Fresh Foam 680 V8 comes equipped with an integrated rubber outsole designed for enhanced underfoot comfort on various surfaces. Meanwhile, the Saucony Cohesion 16's rubber outsole takes cues from trusted styles, ensuring a smooth feel that stands up to lots of miles. Both shoes prioritize durability, but the Fresh Foam's integrated design may provide a slight edge in comfort during longer runs. The choice between these models may ultimately depend on the types of surfaces you typically run on and how much cushioning you desire from the outsole.
Weight and Performance
Weight can significantly impact running performance, and both shoes strive to balance weight with cushioning. The Fresh Foam 680 V8 is designed to deliver a lightweight ride, making it suitable for both everyday runs and longer workouts. Similarly, the Saucony Cohesion 16 emphasizes a smooth transition from heel to toe, ensuring that each step feels effortless. However, specific weight metrics are not provided for either shoe, leaving a subjective evaluation on how they feel during runs. Runners looking for a nimble shoe may lean towards the Fresh Foam for its lightweight reputation, while those valuing stability might prefer the Cohesion 16.
Aesthetics and Style
Aesthetics can play a role in your decision-making process, especially if you plan to wear these shoes outside of running. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 offers a modern design that appeals to a wide audience, while the Saucony Cohesion 16 features a distinctive Mist/Indigo color scheme that some may find particularly attractive. Both brands have a reputation for stylish running shoes, but your personal taste will ultimately guide your choice. If you value a sleek and contemporary look, the New Balance model may suit you better, while the Saucony's unique color scheme may attract those looking for something different.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
Brand reputation can influence consumer trust and preference. New Balance holds a bestseller rank of 13,745, indicating solid popularity, while Saucony's Cohesion 16 ranks slightly lower at 22,129. Both brands are widely recognized in the running shoe market, but New Balance's higher sales rank may suggest a more established trust among consumers. If brand loyalty is important to you, the Fresh Foam 680 V8 might be the more appealing option. However, the Saucony model is still a reputable choice that has garnered its own loyal following.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, both the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe and the Saucony Women's Cohesion 16 Sneaker have their respective strengths. The Fresh Foam 680 V8 offers superior cushioning and a sleek upper design, making it ideal for runners who prioritize comfort and modern aesthetics. On the other hand, the Saucony Cohesion 16 is more budget-friendly and provides excellent breathability, making it a solid choice for those looking for reliable performance without breaking the bank. Ultimately, your decision should come down to your specific running needs, budget, and personal style preferences.

