vsversusfinder

adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash vs ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5,

Updated August 2026 — adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash wins on style, ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on comfort and cushioning.

The adidas Women's Response Pace Running offers great value for casual runners, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 excels in advanced cushioning and durability.

Why adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash is better

Price

adidas is $119.25 cheaper

Sales Rank

adidas has a better sales rank

Fit

adidas has a regular fit

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Cushioning

ASICS features advanced PureGEL technology

Durability

ASICS has a synthetic rubber outsole

Weight

ASICS is approximately 25g lighter

Overall score

adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash
65
ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85

Specifications

Specadidas Women's Response Pace Running, DashASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5,
BrandadidasASICS
ModelResponse PaceGel-Nimbus 28
UpperTextileEngineered Knit
CushioningCloudfoamPureGEL + FF BLAST
OutsoleStandardSynthetic Rubber

Dimension comparison

adidas Women's Response Pace Running, DashASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5,

Price Comparison

The adidas Women's Response Pace Running is priced at $50.70, making it significantly cheaper than the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, which retail for $169.95. This price difference of $119.25 means the adidas option is about 70% less expensive than its ASICS counterpart. For budget-conscious shoppers or those new to running, the lower price point of the adidas model may be a key deciding factor. However, it's essential to consider what you are getting for that price.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 stands out with its advanced cushioning technology. This shoe features PureGEL technology, which is approximately 65% softer compared to standard GEL technology, combined with FF BLAST PLUS cushioning for a responsive ride. Conversely, the adidas Women's Response Pace Running utilizes Cloudfoam cushioning, which also provides comfort but may not match the high-end cushioning experience offered by ASICS. The choice here largely depends on how much emphasis you place on cushioning during your runs.

Fit and Design

The fit of the shoes is another important consideration. The adidas Women's Response Pace Running has a regular fit and a textile upper, providing a straightforward and familiar design. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 features a lightweight, breathable engineered knit upper that reduces the need for overlays, promoting a snug and comfortable fit. This design aspect may appeal to runners who prioritize a modern and advanced fit for longer distances.

Durability and Build Quality

Durability is essential in running shoes, especially for those who log many miles. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is designed with a synthetic rubber outsole and a durable polyester lining, ensuring it can withstand the rigors of frequent use. While the adidas Women's Response Pace Running is also built with quality in mind, it lacks the advanced materials found in the ASICS model. If durability is a critical factor for you, the ASICS may have the edge.

Performance on Different Terrains

Performance can vary significantly depending on terrain. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is engineered for comfort on various surfaces, making it suitable for longer runs and different terrains. Its advanced cushioning technologies contribute to a smooth running experience. The adidas Women's Response Pace Running, while also functional, is better suited for shorter runs or casual wear. If you plan to tackle various terrains or longer distances, the ASICS model may be the more versatile choice.

Weight of the Shoes

Weight can influence running performance, and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 has been noted to be approximately 25g lighter than its predecessor, enhancing its appeal for runners looking for lightweight options. In contrast, the adidas Women's Response Pace Running does not highlight any specific weight advantages in its description. For serious runners, the weight differential can play a crucial role in overall performance and comfort during long runs.

Brand Reputation and Sales Rank

Brand reputation can impact purchasing decisions. Both adidas and ASICS are well-respected in the running community. The adidas Women's Response Pace Running has a sales rank of 9,394, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 has a sales rank of 11,265. Although both products are popular, the adidas model has a stronger sales rank, indicating a broader appeal among customers. This popularity may suggest a more favorable reception among casual runners.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the adidas Women's Response Pace Running and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 ultimately depends on your priorities. If budget is your primary concern, the adidas model at $50.70 offers excellent value, especially for casual runners or those just starting. However, if you're seeking advanced cushioning, superior fit, and durability for long-distance running, the ASICS model, priced at $169.95, could be worth the investment. Each model caters to different types of runners, so your choice should align with your specific running needs and budget considerations.