ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive
Updated July 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on cushioning and weight, Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive wins on popularity and support.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 excels in cushioning and comfort, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 offers superior support and value. Choose based on your priorities.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
Gel-Nimbus 28 features PureGEL technology for softer cushioning.
Weight
Gel-Nimbus 28 is lighter than its predecessor.
Design
Gel-Nimbus 28 has reflective details for visibility.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive is better
Support
Adrenaline GTS 25 has GuideRails for enhanced stability.
Price
Adrenaline GTS 25 is more affordable.
Popularity
Adrenaline GTS 25 has a higher bestseller rank.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $169.95 | $132.99 |
| Sales Rank | 11265 | 459 |
| Cushion Type | PureGEL | DNA LOFT v3 |
| Upper Material | Engineered Knit | Engineered Mesh |
| Closure Type | Lace-up | Flat-knit |
Dimension comparison
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes feature a modern and sleek design, primarily in a Mineral Beige/Cream color scheme. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 offers a more vibrant look with its Spellbound/Blazing Bell/Pink coloration. The Gel-Nimbus 28's engineered knit upper provides a lightweight and breathable experience, while the Adrenaline GTS 25's engineered mesh upper ensures a secure fit with added flexibility. The Gel-Nimbus 28's reflective details enhance visibility during early morning or nighttime runs, making it a practical choice for those who run in varying light conditions. The aesthetic choices of both shoes cater to different style preferences, appealing to a range of runners.
Comfort and Cushioning
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 excels in comfort, primarily due to its PureGEL technology, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology. This shoe also incorporates FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, creating a plush, cloud-like feel. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 features nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, which offers a soft and dynamic response. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Gel-Nimbus 28 may slightly edge out in softness, appealing to those seeking maximum cushioning for longer runs.
Support and Stability
In terms of support, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 stands out due to its GuideRails Holistic Support System, designed to keep excess movement in check, promoting a natural motion path. This feature can be particularly beneficial for runners who struggle with stability. The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 28, while also providing a secure fit, focuses more on cushioning rather than targeted support systems. For runners prioritizing stability during their runs, the Adrenaline GTS 25’s support technology could be a decisive factor.
Weight and Performance
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is approximately 25 grams lighter than its predecessor, enhancing its performance during runs. This lightweight characteristic can make a significant difference in speed and agility for runners. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25, although not explicitly stated, is known for its reliable performance thanks to the combination of its supportive cushioning and effective energy return. If performance and speed are your primary concerns, the lighter weight of the Gel-Nimbus 28 may offer an advantage.
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is priced at $169.95, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 comes in at $132.99. This makes the Gel-Nimbus 28 about 28% more expensive than the Adrenaline GTS 25. For budget-conscious runners, the Adrenaline GTS 25 presents a more economical option without significantly compromising on key features like comfort and support. The price difference may influence buyers who are considering value for money in their footwear choices.
Bestselling Status
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 has a significantly higher bestseller rank of 459, indicating it is a popular choice among consumers. In comparison, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 has a sales rank of 11,265, suggesting it has less market traction. This popularity could reflect broader consumer satisfaction and trust in the Adrenaline GTS 25, making it a safer bet for buyers looking to invest in a well-regarded running shoe.
Fit and Sizing
The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers a classic lace-up closure for a secure fit, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 features a flat-knit collar for added comfort and structure. The Adrenaline GTS 25 is also designed to accommodate natural movement during active use, making it suitable for a variety of foot shapes. Both shoes are available in multiple sizes, but the Adrenaline GTS 25 may be more accommodating due to its specifically designed upper, which adjusts to the foot's movement.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 ultimately depends on your specific running needs. If you prioritize maximum cushioning and a lighter shoe for speed, the Gel-Nimbus 28 may be the better choice. However, if stability, support, and overall value are your main considerations, the Adrenaline GTS 25 is a well-supported option at a lower price. With its higher popularity ranking and robust support features, the Adrenaline GTS 25 might be the safer investment for most runners.

