Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 vs ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on fit and comfort.
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is a budget-friendly option, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers advanced technology for serious runners.
Why Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 is better
Price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $54.86.
Design
Classic look appeals to traditionalists.
Weight
Lightweight due to EVA midsole.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Comfort
Advanced cushioning with PureGEL technology.
Durability
Synthetic rubber outsole for better longevity.
Breathability
Engineered knit upper enhances airflow.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | Cloudfoam | PureGEL |
| Upper Material | Leather/Textile | Engineered Knit |
| Outsole | Synthetic | Synthetic Rubber |
| Sockliner | N/A | OrthoLite X-55 |
| Sales Rank | 2634 | 11265 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is significantly more affordable than the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28, priced at $54.86 compared to $169.95. This price difference makes the Adidas model about 68% cheaper than its ASICS counterpart. If budget is your primary concern, the Run 70s 2.0 offers a compelling option without sacrificing essential features for casual running or daily wear.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, both shoes exhibit distinct styles catering to different preferences. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 features a classic combination of white, black, and grey, appealing to those who appreciate a timeless look. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 presents a modern aesthetic with its mineral beige and cream color scheme. While the Run 70s 2.0 boasts a durable leather and textile upper, the Gel-Nimbus 28 utilizes an engineered knit upper that offers a lightweight and breathable experience. Thus, your choice may depend on whether you prefer a classic or contemporary design.
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is paramount in any running shoe, and both models aim to deliver. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 employs Cloudfoam technology for lightweight cushioning, making it comfortable for everyday wear. However, it is worth noting that these shoes run big, suggesting that buyers should consider purchasing half a size smaller for the perfect fit. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 features PureGEL technology and FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, providing a more advanced, cloud-like experience with softer materials. The OrthoLite X-55 sockliner in ASICS also enhances comfort and moisture management, making it a standout choice for long-distance runners.
Performance Features
When it comes to performance, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 takes the lead with its advanced cushioning technology. The PureGEL technology is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, which could significantly enhance long-distance running comfort. This shoe is designed for a responsive ride, which is essential for serious runners. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, while equipped with a lightweight EVA midsole, is better suited for casual use rather than high-impact activities. Therefore, if you are looking for performance-driven features, the Gel-Nimbus 28 is the better choice.
Durability
Durability is crucial in running shoes, especially for those who frequently hit the pavement. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 features a synthetic outsole designed for reliable grip and durability, which is essential for casual runners. However, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 has a synthetic rubber outsole that promises longevity and resilience under more strenuous conditions. Given its construction and technology, the Gel-Nimbus 28 may offer better durability for serious runners who put their shoes through more rigorous use.
Breathability
Breathability is an important factor for comfort during runs, especially in warmer weather. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 incorporates a breathable textile lining, providing a comfortable environment for your feet. However, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 features an engineered knit upper that is specifically designed to reduce the need for additional overlays, enhancing airflow even further. This feature may make the Gel-Nimbus 28 a more appealing choice for those who prioritize breathability in their running shoes.
Weight
Weight can significantly affect running performance, and here, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is designed to be lighter than its predecessor, weighing approximately 25 grams less than the previous version. This lightweight design, combined with its advanced cushioning technologies, may contribute to a smoother running experience. In contrast, the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, while still lightweight due to its EVA midsole, does not emphasize weight reduction to the same extent. Therefore, if a lighter shoe is a priority for you, the Gel-Nimbus 28 may be the more suitable option.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, your choice between the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 should hinge on your specific needs and budget. If affordability and a classic look are your main criteria, the Adidas option is a fantastic choice at $54.86. Conversely, if you are seeking advanced technology, superior cushioning, and a shoe designed for serious running, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28, priced at $169.95, might be worth the investment. Each shoe has its strengths, so consider your running habits and preferences before making a decision.

