Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 wins on style, Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive wins on cushioning and support.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is a superior choice for serious runners, while the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is ideal for casual wear.
Why Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 is better
Price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $49.00.
Lightweight
Adidas is designed for everyday wear.
Style
Adidas has a sleek casual design.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better
Cushioning
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.
Support
Brooks offers a Guiderails holistic support system.
Durability
Brooks is built for higher performance and long-term wear.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $49.00 | $98.95 |
| Sales Rank | 2513 | 1047 |
| Weight | Light | Moderate |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Air Mesh |
| Midsole | Cloudfoam | DNA Loft v3 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is a lightweight running-inspired sneaker designed for everyday wear, priced at $49.00. With a sales rank of 2513, it appeals to those seeking comfort and style in a casual shoe. The model features a breathable mesh upper and a cushioned Cloudfoam midsole, making it suitable for light activities and daily use. Adidas aims to provide a sleek look while ensuring comfort, which is evident in the design details such as the TPU 3-Stripes.
Overview of the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is a more specialized running shoe, priced at $98.95 and holding a sales rank of 1047. This shoe is designed for runners who need additional support over long distances, featuring nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning for plush comfort. Its certified PDAC A5500 diabetic shoe status and APMA Seal of Acceptance highlight its focus on foot health and comfort. The Adrenaline GTS 24 aims to provide a supportive experience for dedicated runners.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 excels with its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which adapts to your unique stride. The shoe is crafted to deliver soft, smooth cushioning mile after mile, making it an excellent choice for those who log significant running distances. In contrast, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path features a Cloudfoam midsole designed for step-in comfort, but it may not match the advanced cushioning technology found in the Brooks model. For casual wearers, the Adidas shoe might suffice, but serious runners will likely appreciate the enhanced support of the Brooks option.
Design and Aesthetics
Aesthetically, both shoes are designed with a modern flair. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path showcases a sleek silhouette with a black, white, and black color scheme, making it versatile for various outfits. The mesh upper adds a touch of elegance while ensuring breathability. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 presents a more athletic look with a predominantly black design featuring subtle ebony accents. While both options cater to different activities, the Adidas model is geared more towards casual wear, whereas the Brooks shoe is tailored for performance.
Breathability and Fit
Breathability is an essential factor in running shoes. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path utilizes a textile and synthetic mesh upper, promoting airflow to keep feet cool during everyday wear. This design is effective for light activities but may not provide the same level of structure as the Brooks model. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features an engineered air mesh upper that balances breathability, stretch, and structure, ensuring a comfortably accommodating fit. While both shoes excel in breathability, the Brooks shoe offers a more refined fit for serious runners.
Durability and Outsole Performance
Durability is crucial in running shoes, especially for those who plan on more rigorous use. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is designed with a newly engineered outsole that promotes smooth transitions, adding to its durability and performance on varied terrains. The shoe’s overall construction supports long-term wear for consistent runners. Conversely, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path features a rubber outsole that provides outstanding grip and a low-profile look, suitable for light activities. While both shoes offer durability, the Brooks model is built for higher performance, making it a better choice for committed runners.
Price Comparison
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is priced at $49.00, making it approximately 50% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24, which retails at $98.95. This significant price difference may appeal to casual users or those looking for a budget-friendly option. However, it's essential to consider what you're getting for the price. While the Adidas shoe is economical, the Brooks option is engineered for serious runners, offering advanced features and support that justify the higher cost. If you're looking for value in terms of performance, the Brooks might be worth the investment.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 ultimately depends on your intended use. If you're seeking a casual, affordable sneaker for everyday wear, the Adidas model is a solid choice at $49.00. However, for dedicated runners requiring enhanced support, cushioning, and durability, the Brooks shoe, despite its higher price of $98.95, offers features that cater specifically to performance needs. The decision should hinge on how you plan to use the shoes—casual wear versus serious running activity.

