vsversusfinder

Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe -

Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 wins on style, Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on price and performance.

The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is a budget-friendly option for casual wear, while the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 excels in performance and comfort for serious runners.

Why Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 is better

Price

Adidas is $42.75 cheaper.

Style

Minimalist design appeals to casual wear.

Weight

Lighter option for everyday use.

Why Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Cushioning

Brooks features advanced DNA LOFT v2 cushioning.

Breathability

Engineered air mesh enhances airflow.

Durability

RoadTack rubber ensures longer lifespan.

Overall score

Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5
65
Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe -
85

Specifications

SpecAdidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe -
CushioningCloudfoamDNA LOFT v2
UpperMeshEngineered Air Mesh
OutsoleRubberRoadTack Rubber
Sales Rank251312197
WeightLightweightModerate

Dimension comparison

Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is significantly cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Trace 4, costing $49.00 compared to $91.75. This makes the Adidas option about 47% less expensive than its competitor. For shoppers on a budget or those seeking an everyday sneaker, this price difference is substantial. The X_PLR Path provides an excellent entry point into quality running-inspired footwear without breaking the bank, while the Brooks Trace 4, priced at a higher premium, may appeal more to those who prioritize advanced cushioning and technology.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path showcases a sleek and minimalist aesthetic with its black and white color scheme, while the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 features a more vibrant combination of white, oyster, and rose. The Adidas sneaker features a textile and synthetic mesh upper that promotes breathability, making it suitable for casual wear. On the other hand, the Brooks Trace 4 is designed with an engineered air mesh upper, which not only enhances breathability but also ensures a secure fit during runs. Each shoe's design caters to different preferences, highlighting the importance of personal style in footwear choices.

Comfort and Cushioning

Comfort is a vital factor in any running shoe, and here the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 clearly stands out. It incorporates DNA LOFT v2 soft cushioning that adapts to your stride, providing an exceptionally comfortable experience over long distances. In contrast, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path utilizes a Cloudfoam midsole that offers step-in comfort and cushioning for everyday wear. While the Adidas option is comfortable for casual use, those planning to run longer distances may find the superior cushioning of the Brooks shoe more beneficial.

Breathability

Breathability is essential for maintaining comfort during physical activity. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path features a mesh upper that promotes airflow, making it suitable for warmer weather or intense workouts. However, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 takes breathability a step further with its engineered air mesh, designed to keep runners dry and comfortable even during extended use. This additional focus on breathability makes the Brooks shoe especially appealing for serious runners who need to manage moisture and temperature effectively.

Performance

When comparing performance features, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 is equipped with a segmented crash pad that aids in smooth transitions from heel to toe, which can significantly enhance the running experience. This shoe is tailored for those who prioritize performance and efficiency in their runs. Conversely, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is more suited for casual wear and light running activities, as it lacks the specialized features that enhance performance during rigorous workouts. Therefore, serious athletes may find the Brooks shoe more aligned with their needs.

Durability

Durability is crucial when investing in running shoes. The Brooks Women’s Trace 4 is built with RoadTack rubber, a compound designed for durability and lightweight performance, promising a longer lifespan under regular use. Meanwhile, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path features a rubber outsole that provides grip, but it may not be as robust as the materials used in the Brooks shoe. For those who plan to use their shoes frequently or in a variety of conditions, the durability of the Brooks Trace 4 may offer better value over time.

Brand Reputation

Both Adidas and Brooks are reputable brands in the realm of athletic footwear, but they cater to slightly different markets. Adidas is widely recognized for its stylish and versatile designs that appeal to a broader audience, while Brooks is renowned for its commitment to producing high-performance running shoes. The Brooks Women’s Trace 4, with a bestseller rank of 12197, indicates a strong presence among dedicated runners, while the Adidas Women’s X_PLR Path, with a bestseller rank of 2513, is more popular among casual sneaker enthusiasts. This distinction in brand reputation can influence consumer choices based on intended use.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, the choice between the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path and the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. The Adidas option is significantly more affordable at $49.00, making it an excellent choice for casual wear and light running. In contrast, the Brooks shoe, priced at $91.75, offers advanced cushioning and performance features that cater to serious runners. If you prioritize comfort and performance for longer distances, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 is the superior option. However, for everyday use and a lighter price tag, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is hard to beat.