vsversusfinder

Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe

Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 wins on price and sales rank, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe wins on design and cushioning.

The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path offers better value and comfort for casual wear, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 excels in performance for running.

Why Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 is better

Price

Adidas is $23.24 cheaper

Sales Rank

Adidas has a better sales rank (2,513 vs 13,435)

Versatility

Adidas is suitable for everyday wear

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is better

Cushioning

New Balance has advanced Fresh Foam cushioning

Design

New Balance offers a sporty look for varied activities

Performance

New Balance is specifically designed for running

Overall score

Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
75

Specifications

SpecAdidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
BrandadidasNew Balance
Current Price$49.00$72.24
Upper MaterialMeshEngineered Mesh
MidsoleCloudfoamFresh Foam
OutsoleRubberRubber

Dimension comparison

Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe

Price Comparison

The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is priced at $49.00, making it significantly cheaper than the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe, which costs $72.24. This means the Adidas model is about 32% less expensive than its competitor. For budget-conscious shoppers, the price difference might sway the decision towards Adidas, especially for those looking for a running-inspired sneaker for everyday wear. However, buyers should consider whether the price reflects the quality and features they need in a running shoe.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path features a sleek and breathable textile and synthetic mesh upper, which contributes to its lightweight feel. The Cloudfoam midsole enhances comfort, making it ideal for casual wear. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 offers a breathable premium molded engineered mesh upper that promises a comfortable fit. While both shoes prioritize comfort and breathability, the Adidas model presents a more understated, running-inspired aesthetic, whereas the New Balance shoe leans towards a sporty look suitable for varied activities.

Comfort and Cushioning

Comfort is paramount in running shoes, and both models excel in this area. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path incorporates a Cloudfoam midsole designed for step-in comfort and superior cushioning. This feature is particularly beneficial for long periods of wear. Conversely, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 utilizes Fresh Foam midsole cushioning, which is precision-engineered to provide an ultra-cushioned, lightweight ride. While both shoes offer impressive cushioning, the specific technology of each may appeal differently to individual preferences, making this a subjective choice based on personal comfort.

Outsole and Traction

When it comes to traction, both shoes feature rubber outsoles designed to enhance grip. The Adidas model's rubber outsole supports a sleek, low-profile look while offering outstanding grip for everyday wear. The New Balance shoe also includes an integrated rubber outsole that promotes underfoot comfort. Although both provide good traction, the Adidas X_PLR Path’s emphasis on a low-profile design may be more appealing for casual users, while the New Balance shoe’s focus on comfort may attract runners looking for performance on various terrains.

Brand Reputation and Sales Rank

Brand reputation can influence buying decisions. Adidas holds a strong position in the athletic footwear market, and the Women's X_PLR Path has a sales rank of 2,513, indicating its popularity among buyers. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 has a higher sales rank of 13,435, which may suggest it is less favored in comparison. This discrepancy could influence consumer perception, as many shoppers look for bestsellers when making their purchase decisions. The Adidas model’s better sales rank may provide added assurance about its overall appeal and performance.

Versatility and Usage

The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is marketed as a lightweight, running-inspired sneaker suitable for everyday wear. Its design makes it a versatile option for casual activities and light workouts. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is more explicitly designed for running, with features aimed at enhancing performance during physical activity. If your primary use is running, the New Balance shoe may be more appropriate, but for those seeking a more casual sneaker option, the Adidas model shines.

Availability and Value

The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is currently priced at $49.00, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is available for $72.24. This price difference of $23.24 not only reflects a significant savings but also presents the Adidas model as a value option for those who want a stylish and comfortable shoe without breaking the bank. The perceived value can be a deciding factor for budget-conscious consumers who still seek quality in their footwear choices.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If budget is a primary concern, the Adidas model is about 32% cheaper and offers solid comfort and style for everyday wear. However, if you prioritize advanced cushioning and a design tailored for running, the New Balance shoe may be worth the higher investment. Assess your intended use, comfort preferences, and budget to make the best choice for your lifestyle.