Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe

Overview of the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 and New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 is priced at $110.00, while the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 comes in at a more budget-friendly $72.24, making it about 34% cheaper. Both shoes target runners seeking comfort, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. The Brooks model boasts a higher sales rank of 61, indicating its popularity among consumers, while the New Balance sits at 13,435, suggesting it may not be as widely sought after.

Cushioning and Comfort

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, designed to provide a soft and responsive ride. This model is particularly praised for its smooth transitions, thanks to a newly designed midsole that encourages a natural flow during runs. On the other hand, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 boasts its own Fresh Foam midsole cushioning, engineered for an ultra-cushioned experience. While both shoes offer significant comfort, the Brooks model has a more advanced cushioning technology, which could be a deciding factor for those prioritizing a plush feel on longer runs.

Breathability and Fit

When it comes to breathability, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 utilizes a double jacquard air mesh upper, ensuring optimal airflow and comfort during intense activities. This design adapts to the foot's natural movements, offering a snug fit. Conversely, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 features a breathable, molded engineered mesh upper that supports comfort but does not emphasize adaptiveness to the same extent as the Brooks. If breathability is a top concern during warm weather runs, the Brooks offers a slight edge.

Durability and Outsole Performance

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 is equipped with an innovative rubber outsole crafted with recycled silica, promising durability and lightweight performance. This makes it suitable for various terrains, which is a significant factor for runners who tackle different surfaces. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 also has an integrated rubber outsole, but it lacks the emphasis on recycled materials and advanced durability features found in the Brooks. This difference could influence long-term performance, particularly for those who plan to wear their shoes frequently.

Versatility

The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 is marketed as a versatile shoe suitable for road running, walking, cross-training, travel, and gym workouts. Its design supports a wide array of activities, making it an excellent everyday companion. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9, while also catering to running, does not explicitly mention versatility in other areas. For users seeking a multi-purpose shoe, the Brooks option may be more appealing, as it covers a broader range of activities.

Certification and Eco-Friendliness

One notable feature of the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 is its certification as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and its APMA Seal of Acceptance, ensuring it meets high standards for foot health. Additionally, the Brooks model is a certified carbon-neutral product, which may appeal to environmentally conscious consumers. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 lacks similar certifications, meaning it may not resonate as strongly with those prioritizing eco-friendliness or specific medical needs.

Price Comparison

At $110.00, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 is significantly pricier than the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9, which costs $72.24. This price difference of about $37.76 represents a 34% increase for the Brooks model. While the Brooks offers advanced features and certifications, the New Balance provides a more economical option, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious consumers who still seek quality.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize advanced cushioning, breathability, and eco-friendliness, the Brooks model is worth the investment at $110.00. However, if you are looking for a more affordable option that still provides decent comfort for casual running, the New Balance priced at $72.24 could be the better choice. Both shoes have their merits, but your decision should align with your running habits and budget considerations.