adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, vs ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on durability and eco-friendliness.
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 offers great value for casual wear, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 excels in performance and advanced features.
Why adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, is better
Price
Cloudfoam is significantly cheaper at $57.00.
Comfort
Cloudfoam provides excellent step-in comfort.
Weight
Cloudfoam is lightweight and suitable for casual use.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Performance
Gel-Nimbus 27 is designed for serious runners.
Cushioning
Gel-Nimbus 27 features advanced PureGEL technology.
Sustainability
Gel-Nimbus 27 uses 75% recycled materials.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | ASICS |
| Model | Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 | Gel-Nimbus 27 |
| Upper Material | Textile | Jacquard Mesh |
| Cushioning | Cloudfoam | PureGEL |
| Recycled Content | 50% | 75% |
Dimension comparison
Overview of adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes are designed for comfort and style, making them an appealing choice for runners and casual wearers alike. Priced at $57.00, these shoes offer a lightweight design that is specifically tailored for women's feet. The Cloudfoam technology ensures a cushioned experience, which is enhanced by the shoe's flexible upper made from soft textile materials. Additionally, with a sales rank of 8,845, they may not be the top seller, but they provide significant value for those in search of comfort at an accessible price.
Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes
In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes come with a higher price tag of $124.95, reflecting their advanced technology and superior cushioning. With a sales rank of 2,393, these shoes are among the more popular choices for serious runners. They feature PureGEL technology, which offers lightweight cushioning and a responsive toe-off. The engineered jacquard mesh upper provides a snug fit while being environmentally friendly, as at least 75% of the shoe's main upper material is made from recycled content.
Comfort and Fit Comparison
When it comes to comfort, the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 excels with its memory sockliner that molds to the foot for enhanced step-in comfort. The cushioned midsole is designed for a plush experience, making them ideal for casual wear and light running. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 focuses on performance with its PureGEL technology for softer landings and a responsive feel during runs. This technology may make them a better choice for those engaging in serious running, while the Cloudfoam model caters to those prioritizing everyday comfort.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 features a sleek and modern look with a black, black, and core white color scheme. This combination not only adds to its aesthetic appeal but also makes it versatile for various outfits. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27, available in a black and lake grey colorway, also maintains a contemporary appearance, which is typical for performance-oriented footwear. Both shoes offer fashionable designs, but the choice may come down to personal preference and style.
Sustainability Efforts
Sustainability is a key focus for both brands, but they approach it differently. The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is made with at least 50% recycled content, representing a commitment to reducing plastic waste. Meanwhile, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 takes this a step further by ensuring that at least 75% of the shoe's main upper material is recycled, along with a sockliner produced with a dyeing process that reduces water and carbon emissions. For environmentally conscious consumers, the ASICS model may be seen as the more responsible choice.
Price Difference and Value
The price difference between these two models is significant, with the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 priced at $57.00 and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 at $124.95, making the Cloudfoam about 54% cheaper. This substantial difference means that the adidas model is more accessible for those on a budget or looking for a shoe that blends functionality with affordability. However, the higher price of the ASICS model may be justified by its advanced features and performance capabilities, appealing to avid runners willing to invest in quality footwear.
Performance and Durability
In terms of performance, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 is designed for serious runners, with features that support vigorous activity, such as PureGEL technology for cushioning and a design that promotes a responsive toe-off. This makes them suitable for longer runs and varied terrains. Alternatively, the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is more suitable for casual activities and light running, due to its focus on comfort rather than performance-driven features. If durability is a priority, the ASICS model may provide better longevity under strenuous conditions.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 largely depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize affordability and everyday comfort, the Cloudfoam model at $57.00 offers great value without compromising on style. However, if you are a dedicated runner seeking advanced cushioning and performance features, the ASICS model at $124.95 may be the better investment. Ultimately, your choice should reflect your lifestyle, budget, and the primary use of the shoes.

