vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X

Updated April 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running wins on eco impact and sustainability, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X wins on fit and upper comfort.

Winner
ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, Black/Lake Grey$124.95

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, Black/Lake Grey

ASICS

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running Shoe, Black/Phantom/Sea Salt, 9 M$129.99

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 1080 V14 Running Shoe, Black/Phantom/Sea Salt, 9 M

New Balance

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running edges out the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X with a lower price point and significantly higher sustainability metrics, including 75% recycled upper content. While the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X offers a gusseted tongue for debris protection, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running provides superior eco-credentials and cushioning technology details for environmentally conscious runners.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running is better

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running costs less

$124.95 vs $129.99

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running uses more recycled materials

75% recycled upper content

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running has higher bio-based cushioning

24% bio-based vs 3%

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running reduces water usage

33% less water via solution dyeing

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running lowers carbon emissions

45% less carbon in dyeing process

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X is better

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X features debris protection

Gusseted tongue design

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X offers customized fit

Adjustable lace closure

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X utilizes no-sew overlays

Enhanced upper construction

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running
90
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X
86

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 RunningNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam X
Price$124.95$129.99
Upper MaterialEngineered jacquard meshSynthetic and engineered mesh
Recycled Content75% of main upperNot specified
Bio-based Cushioning24% bio-based content3% bio-based content
Tongue DesignStandardGusseted
Dyeing ProcessSolution dyeingNot specified
Cushioning TechnologyPureGEL + FF BLAST PLUS ECOFresh Foam X
Closure SystemLaceAdjustable lace closure

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 RunningNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam X

Design and Build Quality

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X both present themselves as premium options within the running shoe category. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running utilizes an engineered jacquard mesh upper designed to wrap the foot with a soft feel. This construction aims to balance breathability with structural support. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X employs a synthetic and engineered mesh upper. Both shoes feature lace closure systems, though the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X specifies an adjustable lace closure for a customized fit. The build quality in both instances suggests a focus on durability suitable for road running, with the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X highlighting no-sew overlays which can reduce potential irritation points.

Cushioning Technology

Cushioning is a critical factor for running shoes, and both models employ proprietary foam technologies. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running incorporates PureGEL technology, which helps provide lightweight cushioning and softer landings. This is paired with FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X features Fresh Foam X midsole foam, which the brand describes as delivering their most cushioned Fresh Foam experience for incredible comfort. While both aim for soft landings, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running explicitly mentions responsive toe-off capabilities associated with its FF BLAST PLUS ECO compound. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X focuses on the overall cushioned experience without specific mention of toe-off responsiveness in the provided data.

Sustainability and Materials

Environmental impact is a significant differentiator between these two models. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running states that at least 75% of the shoe's main upper material is made with recycled content to reduce waste and carbon emissions. Furthermore, the sockliner is produced with a solution dyeing process. This process reduces water usage by approximately 33% and carbon emissions by approximately 45% compared to conventional dyeing technology. The cushioning in the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running is made with approximately 24% bio-based content using renewable sources. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X also incorporates sustainability, noting that its Fresh Foam X midsole foam has approximately 3% bio-based content made from renewable resources to help reduce carbon footprint. However, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running provides more extensive data regarding recycled content and resource reduction.

Fit and Comfort

Fit is subjective but influenced by specific design choices. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X features a gusseted tongue designed to help keep debris out. This can be a significant advantage for runners on trails or uneven surfaces where small stones might enter the shoe. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running focuses on the soft feel of the engineered jacquard mesh upper to wrap the foot. Both shoes utilize lace closures to secure the foot. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X highlights an adjustable lace closure for a customized fit, suggesting potential flexibility in locking down the midfoot. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running relies on the upper material's ability to conform to the foot shape for comfort.

Upper Construction

The upper construction dictates breathability and durability. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running uses an engineered jacquard mesh. This type of mesh often allows for varying densities in different zones to provide support where needed and ventilation where possible. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X uses a combination of synthetic and engineered mesh. Additionally, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X includes no-sew overlays. No-sew construction can reduce weight and eliminate potential friction points caused by stitching, which may enhance comfort during long runs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running does not specify no-sew overlays in the provided data, focusing instead on the recycled content of the main upper material.

Price and Value

Price is often a deciding factor for consumers. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running is listed at $124.95. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X is listed at $129.99. This makes the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running the more affordable option by approximately $5.04. When considering the specifications provided, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running offers higher percentages of recycled and bio-based materials at a lower price point. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X commands a slightly higher price, potentially justified by the gusseted tongue and no-sew overlay construction. For buyers prioritizing cost alongside sustainability metrics, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running presents a strong value proposition.

Performance Expectations

Based on the technical specifications, both shoes are designed for road running. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running emphasizes softer landings through PureGEL technology and a responsive toe-off via FF BLAST PLUS ECO. This suggests a shoe capable of handling impact while returning energy. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X prioritizes incredible comfort through its midsole foam. The gusseted tongue on the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X may offer a more secure feel during variable conditions. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running's focus on recycled content does not appear to compromise the stated performance features like cushioning and landing softness. Both models aim to provide a protective layer between the foot and the road.

Which One Should You Buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X depends on individual priorities. If sustainability and detailed eco-specifications are paramount, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running is the clear choice with 75% recycled upper content and significant water and carbon reduction in manufacturing. It also offers a lower price. If debris protection and a gusseted tongue are higher priorities for your running environment, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X offers specific features to address those needs. Both shoes offer advanced cushioning technologies suitable for comfort-focused running. The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running edges ahead for those seeking maximum environmental responsibility per dollar spent.