adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
Updated August 2026 — adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, wins on weight, Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive wins on price and support.
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 offers a budget-friendly, comfortable option, while the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 excels in support and cushioning. Choose based on your running needs.
Why adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, is better
Price
adidas is $41.95 cheaper
Weight
adidas is lighter and more flexible
Sustainability
adidas uses recycled materials
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better
Support
Brooks has Guiderails for stability
Cushioning
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3
Breathability
Brooks has engineered air mesh upper
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 | Adrenaline GTS 24 |
| Cushioning | Cloudfoam | DNA Loft v3 |
| Upper | Textile | Air Mesh |
| Fit | Women's-specific | Accommodating |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes are priced at $57.00, making them about 43% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24, which retails for $98.95. For budget-conscious consumers, the price difference is significant, especially considering that both shoes cater to running enthusiasts. While the adidas option is designed for comfort and casual running, the Brooks model is positioned as a supportive shoe, reflecting its higher price point. The adidas running shoes are a great choice if you're looking for a more economical option without compromising on basic comfort.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, both shoes offer unique cushioning technologies. The adidas Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 features a Cloudfoam midsole that provides superior step-in comfort, designed specifically for a women's fit. Its memory sockliner molds to the foot, enhancing overall comfort during runs. On the other hand, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 boasts nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which delivers a plush, lightweight feel that adapts to individual running styles. For those who prioritize cushioning and comfort in each stride, the Brooks model might be the more suitable choice, especially given its enhanced technology for a smoother ride.
Weight and Flexibility
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is categorized as a lightweight running sneaker, emphasizing flexibility and comfort through its soft textile upper. This makes it an excellent choice for casual runners or those who appreciate a less restrictive fit. While the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 also provides comfort, its focus is on support and stability rather than outright flexibility. If you prefer a shoe that feels light and unrestricted, the adidas option might be the better fit. However, if you need extra support on longer runs, the Brooks shoe’s design may serve you better.
Breathability and Fit
Breathability is a key factor in running shoes, and both models address this need differently. The adidas Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 features a soft textile upper, which offers a comfortable fit while ensuring decent airflow. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 takes this a step further with its engineered air mesh upper, designed for optimal breathability, stretch, and structure. This feature helps maintain a comfortably accommodating fit, especially in longer runs. For runners who sweat more or plan on longer distances, the Brooks may provide a more breathable option, whereas the adidas might suffice for more casual use.
Support and Stability
Support is where the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 truly shines. It incorporates the Guiderails Holistic Support System, designed to support the body’s natural motion path, mitigating excess movement during runs. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who may need additional stability. In contrast, the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 lacks such specialized support mechanisms, focusing instead on comfort and a women's-specific fit. Runners who require extra support due to overpronation or other gait issues should consider the Brooks model as the more suitable choice for their needs.
Sustainability
Sustainability is increasingly important in today's market, and the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 emphasizes this aspect by being made with recycled materials, featuring at least 50% recycled content in its upper. This initiative represents adidas's commitment to reducing plastic waste. Unfortunately, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 does not highlight any sustainable practices in its construction. For environmentally conscious consumers, the adidas option stands out as the more responsible choice, aligning with eco-friendly values.
Style and Aesthetics
When it comes to style, both shoes present a sleek, modern aesthetic, but the appeal may vary depending on personal preference. The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 comes in a classic black/black/core white colorway, offering a versatile look that pairs well with various outfits. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features a black/black/ebony design that also maintains a contemporary feel. While both styles are appealing, the adidas may cater more to those looking for a casual, everyday sneaker, while the Brooks may attract serious runners seeking a performance-oriented appearance.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 largely depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize budget, comfort, and sustainability, the adidas model at $57.00 is an excellent choice. However, if you require more support, stability, and superior cushioning for longer runs, the Brooks, priced at $98.95, may be worth the investment. Ultimately, both shoes have their strengths; your choice should align with your running style and personal preferences.

