adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive
Updated July 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive leads on price and support.
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is a budget-friendly option for casual wear, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 excels in support and performance for serious runners.
Why adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, is better
Price
Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is $57.00, significantly cheaper than Adrenaline GTS 25.
Weight
Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is lighter, making it more suitable for casual use.
Style
Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 offers a sleek, minimalist design.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive is better
Support
Adrenaline GTS 25 features GuideRails for superior support.
Cushioning
Adrenaline GTS 25 uses advanced nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning.
Durability
Adrenaline GTS 25 is built for extensive use with high-quality materials.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 | Adrenaline GTS 25 |
| Fit | Women-specific | Breathable mesh |
| Cushion Type | Cloudfoam | DNA LOFT v3 |
| Sales Rank | 8845 | 459 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes are significantly more affordable than the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25. Priced at $57.00, the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is about 57% cheaper than the Adrenaline GTS 25, which costs $132.99. This price difference makes the adidas model a more accessible option for budget-conscious buyers. Additionally, while the Cloudfoam Pure has a bestseller rank of 8,845, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 ranks much higher at 459, reflecting its popularity among serious runners and walkers.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 features a sleek, minimalist aesthetic in a classic colorway of black, black, and core white. Its lightweight and stretchy textile upper provides a soft, comfortable fit that is both modern and functional. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 comes in a vibrant Spellbound and Blazing Bell Pink combination, making it a standout choice for those who prefer bold colors. While both shoes prioritize comfort and style, the adidas offers a more understated look compared to the energetic design of the Brooks.
Comfort and Fit
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 excels in comfort, thanks to its Cloudfoam memory sockliner that molds to the foot for superior step-in comfort. This shoe is designed with a women-specific fit, catering specifically to the contours of female feet. Conversely, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 features a breathable engineered mesh upper and a flat-knit collar, providing a secure and comfortable fit. It also incorporates a GuideRails holistic support system that helps maintain natural motion while reducing excess movement. Both models offer excellent comfort, but the Brooks may be preferable for those needing additional support during longer runs.
Cushioning Technology
Cushioning technology is a significant differentiator between the two models. The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 uses a Cloudfoam midsole, delivering plush cushioning that enhances comfort for everyday wear and light running. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 features nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, offering a softer, more dynamic experience. This advanced cushioning technology not only enhances comfort but also provides energy return, making each step feel effortless. For serious runners, the cushioning in the Brooks may provide a performance edge, particularly over longer distances.
Versatility
Both shoes are versatile but cater to different needs. The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is ideal for casual wear and light running, making it a great choice for everyday activities and gym sessions. Its lightweight design and casual aesthetic allow it to transition well from the treadmill to a coffee shop. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 is specifically designed for running and walking, providing reliable support and comfort for more intense activities. Its certification as a PDAC A5500 diabetic shoe also adds to its versatility, making it suitable for a wider audience with specific foot health needs.
Performance and Support
In performance terms, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 stands out with its GuideRails support system, which provides unparalleled stability and helps prevent injury by ensuring the foot moves naturally. This shoe is perfect for runners seeking a smooth ride over longer distances. Meanwhile, the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0, while comfortable, lacks the specialized support features present in the Brooks model, making it less suited for serious running. Therefore, if you're primarily focused on performance and support, the Brooks would likely be the better choice.
Durability
Durability is essential when investing in running shoes. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 is constructed with high-quality materials and designed for extensive use, evident in its higher price point and advanced features. The engineered mesh upper and robust rubber outsole contribute to its longevity, making it a solid investment for regular runners. The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0, while durable for casual wear, may not withstand the same level of rigorous use as the Brooks over time, especially for dedicated runners.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you are looking for an affordable, stylish shoe for casual wear or light running, the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is an excellent choice at $57.00. However, if your focus is on serious running, support, and performance, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25, priced at $132.99, will provide the necessary features for a comfortable and supportive experience. Each shoe has its strengths, making it vital to consider how you plan to use them before making a decision.

