adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, vs Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, wins on weight, Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on breathability and cushioning.
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 offers better value and comfort for casual wear, while the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 excels in performance for serious runners.
Why adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, is better
lower price
adidas is $57.00 vs Brooks at $91.75
sustainability
adidas uses 50% recycled content
style versatility
adidas has a sleek design suitable for casual wear
Why Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
performance features
Brooks has a segmented crash pad for better transitions
cushioning technology
Brooks uses DNA LOFT v2 for superior comfort
breathability
Brooks features an engineered air mesh upper
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, | Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 | Trace 4 |
| Upper Material | Textile | Mesh |
| Cushioning | Cloudfoam | DNA LOFT v2 |
| Sustainability | 50% recycled | Recycled silica |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When comparing the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe, the adidas option is significantly cheaper. Priced at $57.00, the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is about 38% less expensive than the Brooks shoe, which retails for $91.75. This price difference may make the adidas running shoes an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers who do not want to sacrifice comfort or style.
Design and Aesthetics
The design of the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes focuses on a modern and sleek look, complemented by a black, black, and core white color scheme. This color palette allows for versatility in styling, making them suitable for both running and casual wear. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 features a more vibrant design with its white, oyster, and rose colors. While both shoes aim for aesthetic appeal, the choice ultimately boils down to personal preference in color and style.
Comfort Features
Comfort is paramount in running shoes, and both models excel in this regard. The adidas Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 incorporates a memory sockliner that molds to the foot for superior step-in comfort. This shoe also features a cushioned Cloudfoam midsole, ensuring that each step feels soft and supported. On the other hand, the Brooks Trace 4 utilizes DNA LOFT v2 soft cushioning, designed to provide maximum comfort mile after mile. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the specific technologies used cater to different preferences in cushioning feel.
Fit and Sizing
The fit of both shoes is tailored for women but differs in construction. The adidas Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 offers a women's-specific fit with a soft textile upper that is stretchy and comfortable, promoting a snug feel without sacrificing flexibility. Meanwhile, the Brooks Trace 4 features an engineered air mesh upper that enhances breathability and provides a secure fit. Customers may find the fit of the adidas shoe more accommodating for casual wear, while the Brooks option may cater better to serious runners seeking performance.
Performance on Different Surfaces
When it comes to performance, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 is designed with a segmented crash pad and sculpted grooves in the heel and outsole, which helps absorb impact and create smooth transitions. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who frequently change pace or surface. The adidas Cloudfoam Pure 2.0, while also providing cushioning, is more focused on comfort rather than performance enhancements. Therefore, serious runners may lean towards the Brooks for its performance-driven features.
Sustainability
Sustainability is a growing concern among consumers, and both brands are taking steps in this direction. The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is made with at least 50% recycled content, representing an effort to reduce plastic waste. Although the Brooks Trace 4 does not explicitly state its recycled material use, its RoadTack Rubber outsole includes recycled silica, contributing to a more sustainable product. Consumers who prioritize eco-friendliness may find the adidas option slightly more appealing due to its clear commitment to using recycled materials.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
Both adidas and Brooks have established reputations in the running shoe market, catering to different segments of consumers. The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 has a sales rank of 8,845, indicating a solid level of popularity, while the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 holds a sales rank of 12,197, suggesting it is somewhat less popular in comparison. While sales rank can be an indicator of brand preference, it is essential to consider individual needs and preferences when choosing between these two options.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe hinges largely on individual priorities. If budget is a key concern, the adidas option offers significant savings at $57.00 compared to the Brooks' $91.75. For those seeking maximum comfort and style for everyday wear, the adidas shoe may be the preferable choice. However, for serious runners looking for performance features and durability, the Brooks Trace 4 may be worth the additional investment. Each shoe has its strengths, making it essential to evaluate what aspects matter most to you.

