Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, vs ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
Updated August 2026 — Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, wins on weight and breathability, ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on support and comfort.
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 is a budget-friendly option for short runs, while the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers superior stability and cushioning for serious runners.
Why Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, is better
Price
Adidas is $57.95 cheaper than ASICS
Weight
Adidas weighs 8.7 ounces, lighter than ASICS
Design
Adidas has a sporty look with a breathable upper
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better
Cushioning
ASICS features advanced Rearfoot PureGEL technology
Stability
ASICS includes a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for better support
Sustainability
ASICS uses recycled materials in its construction
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, | ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | ASICS |
| Model | Duramo SL 2.0 | GT-2000 13 |
| Upper Material | Synthetic/Textile | Jacquard Mesh |
| Midsole | LIGHTMOTION | PureGEL |
| Intended Use | Short-to-mid distance | Long distance |
| Sustainability | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running and the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe cater to different needs and preferences in the realm of running shoes. The Adidas model is priced at $42.00, making it about 58% cheaper than the ASICS model, which retails for $99.95. This price difference may influence your decision depending on your budget and intended use.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 features a clean and sporty look with a White/Black/Dash Grey color scheme. In contrast, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers a more classic Black/White combination. The Adidas shoe’s synthetic and textile mesh upper promotes breathability and durability, while the ASICS model boasts a jacquard mesh upper that provides a supportive foothold. Consumers looking for a lightweight option may prefer the Adidas design, which weighs only 8.7 ounces, whereas the ASICS model focuses on comfort and support.
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is a crucial factor in any running shoe, and the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 incorporates a LIGHTMOTION midsole that offers light cushioning for a responsive feel during runs. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 features advanced cushioning technologies, including Rearfoot PureGEL technology and a sockliner designed with a solution dyeing process for softer landings. The ASICS shoe aims to provide an overall comfortable experience, particularly for longer distances, while the Adidas shoe is better suited for short-to-mid distance training.
Performance
In terms of performance, the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 is designed for short-to-mid distance training, emphasizing lightweight comfort. The Adiwear outsole contributes to its high-wear durability, ensuring it can handle frequent use on various surfaces. Conversely, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is crafted with a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, promoting advanced stability for a smoother stride. Its features make it a strong contender for runners who prioritize stability and support, especially during long runs.
Sustainability
Sustainability is becoming increasingly important for many consumers. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 stands out in this aspect, as at least 50% of its main upper material is made with recycled content, aimed at reducing waste and carbon emissions. Additionally, the sockliner's production process significantly cuts down on water usage and carbon emissions compared to conventional methods. While the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 does not highlight its sustainability efforts, its lightweight design may inherently support efficiency in performance.
Price Comparison
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 is currently priced at $42.00, while the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 is priced at $99.95. This substantial difference of about $57.95 makes the Adidas model particularly attractive for budget-conscious buyers or those new to running who may not want to invest heavily in their first pair of running shoes. The ASICS model, though more expensive, offers features that may justify the cost for serious runners seeking advanced stability and cushioning.
Sales Rank and Popularity
The sales rank can serve as an indicator of a product's popularity and consumer trust. The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 holds a sales rank of 26,907, which is significantly lower than the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13, which ranks at 9,491. This suggests that the ASICS model is more popular among consumers, likely due to its performance features and brand reputation. For those who prioritize a well-regarded product backed by strong consumer approval, the ASICS may be the preferable choice.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running and the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe depends on your individual running needs and budget. If you are looking for an economical option that provides lightweight comfort for short-to-mid distance training, the Adidas model is an excellent choice at $42.00. However, if you prioritize advanced stability, superior cushioning, and sustainability, the ASICS model, despite its higher price of $99.95, may offer the value you seek.

