Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, vs Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated July 2026 — Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on price and versatility.
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is a budget-friendly option for casual runners, while the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 offers superior comfort and versatility for serious athletes.
Why Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, is better
Price
Adidas is 62% cheaper than Brooks
Weight
Adidas is lighter at 8.7 ounces
Target Audience
Adidas is ideal for casual runners
Why Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Comfort
Brooks features advanced DNA LOFT v3 cushioning
Versatility
Brooks is suitable for various activities
Sales Rank
Brooks has a higher bestseller rank of 61
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, | Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Duramo SL 2.0 | Ghost 17 |
| Cushioning | LIGHTMOTION | DNA LOFT v3 |
| Upper | Mesh | Double Jacquard |
| Sales Rank | 26907 | 61 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running and Brooks Women’s Ghost 17
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is priced at $42.00, making it about 62% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17, which retails for $110.00. This significant price difference positions the Duramo SL 2.0 as a budget-friendly option for runners looking for lightweight footwear. However, the Brooks Ghost 17, with a bestseller rank of 61, is highly regarded among serious runners for its advanced features and comfort.
Design and Aesthetics
The design of the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running focuses on functionality and breathability, featuring a synthetic and textile mesh upper that ensures durability while keeping the shoe lightweight at just 8.7 ounces for size 7. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 boasts a sleek look with a double jacquard air mesh upper, providing both comfort and breathability. The Ghost 17 is available in an appealing white/black/rose gold color scheme, which may attract runners looking for style alongside performance.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is a key consideration for any running shoe, and both models deliver in their own ways. The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running utilizes adidas LIGHTMOTION technology for super-light cushioning, aiming to provide a great step-in feel. However, the Brooks Ghost 17 excels in this category with its nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, promoting soft and dynamic support through every mile. This advanced cushioning system may appeal to those who prioritize comfort during longer runs.
Performance and Stability
In terms of performance, the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is designed for short-to-mid distance training, making it suitable for everyday runs or casual jogs. Its Adiwear outsole is engineered for high-wear durability, ensuring reliable traction on various surfaces. The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17, on the other hand, offers neutral support and smooth transitions thanks to its precisely designed midsole and flex grooves. This design feature enhances the shoe's ability to maintain speed and momentum during runs, making it a better option for serious athletes.
Breathability
When it comes to breathability, both shoes incorporate mesh uppers to promote airflow. The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running’s breathable mesh upper is intended to keep feet cool and comfortable during shorter runs. The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 takes this a step further with its double jacquard air mesh upper, which not only provides excellent breathability but also adapts to the foot’s natural movements for a snug fit. This feature may be particularly beneficial for runners who experience heat buildup during long-distance runs.
Versatility
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is ideal for casual runners or those just starting their training journey. Its lightweight construction and affordability make it a great entry-level option. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 is more versatile, suited for a variety of activities including road running, walking, cross-training, and gym workouts. This adaptability, combined with its certification as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, enhances its appeal to a broader audience who may need a reliable everyday shoe.
Price Comparison
The price difference between the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running and the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 is notable. Priced at $42.00, the Adidas model is about 62% less expensive than the Brooks shoe, which costs $110.00. This substantial price gap makes the Duramo SL 2.0 an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers, especially those who are new to running or looking for a backup pair of shoes. However, the higher price of the Ghost 17 reflects its advanced technology and reputation, which may justify the investment for seasoned runners.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running and the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 ultimately depends on your running needs and budget. If you are looking for an economical, lightweight shoe for casual runs, the Adidas model is a solid choice at $42.00. However, for serious runners seeking exceptional comfort, support, and versatility, the Brooks Ghost 17, despite its higher price of $110.00, offers significant advantages that can enhance your running experience.

