adidas Womens Swift Run White/White/Gold Metallic 7.5 vs Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running &
Updated August 2026 — adidas Womens Swift Run White/White/Gold Metallic 7.5 wins on style and weight, Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & wins on support and cushioning.
The adidas Womens Swift Run offers a budget-friendly option with lightweight comfort, while the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 excels in support and durability.
Why adidas Womens Swift Run White/White/Gold Metallic 7.5 is better
Price
adidas is $40 cheaper
Weight
adidas is lighter and more flexible
Design
adidas has a sleek and sporty look
Why Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & is better
Support
Brooks features advanced support technologies
Durability
Brooks is built for long-lasting use
Sales Rank
Brooks has a better sales rank at 3,616
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | adidas Womens Swift Run White/White/Gold Metallic 7.5 | Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Cushioning | EVA | DNA Loft v3 |
| Sales Rank | 14676 | 3616 |
| Fit | Flexible | Roomy |
| Upper | Knit | Engineered |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The adidas Womens Swift Run is priced at $79.95, making it about 33% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24, which costs $119.95. This significant price difference may be a crucial factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for a reliable pair of running shoes. While both shoes cater to women, the adidas model offers a more economically accessible option without compromising on essential features like comfort and flexibility. In contrast, the Brooks model, although pricier, is known for its advanced support systems and durable cushioning, which may justify the higher cost for some users.
Comfort Level
When it comes to comfort, both the adidas Womens Swift Run and the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 are designed to provide a pleasant wearing experience. The adidas shoe features a soft knit upper that is stretchy and comfortable, along with a lightweight EVA midsole for step-absorbing cushioning. On the other hand, the Brooks model emphasizes maximum support and comfort through its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which adapts to the user's unique stride. While the adidas model focuses on all-day comfort, the Brooks shoe aims for runners and walkers who require more structured support.
Support Features
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 excels in support features, offering a GuideRails holistic support system that helps maintain natural motion paths and limits excess joint movement. This model is certified as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and has received the APMA Seal of Acceptance, making it particularly suitable for those needing extra stability. Conversely, the adidas Womens Swift Run does not have specialized support technologies, which may make it less suitable for those with specific foot issues or looking for high-performance running shoes.
Weight and Flexibility
In terms of weight and flexibility, the adidas Womens Swift Run is designed to be lightweight, catering to those who prioritize agility and ease of movement. The flexible upper aids in providing a snug fit, making it a great option for casual wear and light running. While the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 may be slightly heavier due to its more robust support features, it compensates with its resilient cushioning that provides a stable base. Thus, if you value a lightweight, flexible shoe, the adidas option might be preferable, while the Brooks will appeal to those needing more substantial support.
Sales Rank and Popularity
In terms of sales rank, the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 has a significantly better ranking at 3,616 compared to the adidas Womens Swift Run, which holds a rank of 14,676. This indicates that the Brooks model is more popular among consumers, possibly due to its enhanced support features and overall comfort. A higher sales rank often correlates with customer satisfaction and performance, suggesting that the Brooks may be a more trusted choice for serious runners or those seeking reliable walking shoes.
Design and Aesthetics
The aesthetic design of the adidas Womens Swift Run leans toward a sleek and sporty look with its white, gold metallic color scheme, making it versatile for various casual outfits. The soft knit upper contributes to its modern appearance. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 comes in a striking Coconut/Chateau/Portabella colorway, which may appeal to those looking for a more vibrant and bold design. While both shoes boast attractive designs, your personal style preference will likely influence your decision.
Durability and Longevity
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 is built with durability in mind, featuring nitrogen-infused cushioning that is designed to last longer and maintain its comfort over time. The structured support offered by the GuideRails technology further enhances its longevity, making it a solid investment for regular runners or walkers. On the other hand, while the adidas Womens Swift Run is also durable, its lightweight construction may not withstand the same level of wear as the Brooks over extended periods of intensive use.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, your choice between the adidas Womens Swift Run and the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 will largely depend on your specific needs. If you prioritize budget, lightweight comfort, and a sleek design, then the adidas model, priced at $79.95, is an excellent option. However, if you're looking for superior support, stability, and durability for running or walking, the Brooks model, albeit at a higher price of $119.95, may be worth the investment. Both shoes serve their purpose well, but understanding your personal requirements will help you make the best decision.

