adidas Womens Swift Run White/White/Gold Metallic 7.5 vs Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated July 2026 — adidas Womens Swift Run White/White/Gold Metallic 7.5 wins on style, Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on price and breathability.
The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 offers superior cushioning and breathability, making it a better choice for serious runners, while the adidas Womens Swift Run is more budget-friendly and stylish for casual wear.
Why adidas Womens Swift Run White/White/Gold Metallic 7.5 is better
Price
adidas is $30 cheaper
Style
adidas has a sleek design
Lightweight
adidas is lighter for casual use
Why Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks has advanced DNA Loft v3 cushioning
Breathability
Brooks features a double jacquard air mesh upper
Versatility
Brooks is suitable for various activities including running and walking
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | adidas Womens Swift Run White/White/Gold Metallic 7.5 | Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Swift Run | Ghost 17 |
| Upper Material | Knit | Air Mesh |
| Midsole | EVA | DNA Loft v3 |
| Sales Rank | 14676 | 61 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the adidas Womens Swift Run and Brooks Women’s Ghost 17
The adidas Womens Swift Run is priced at $79.95, making it about 27% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17, which retails for $110.00. While both shoes cater to women's running needs, they differ significantly in design, cushioning technology, and overall functionality.
Design and Aesthetics
The adidas Womens Swift Run features a sleek and minimalistic design in a White/White/Gold Metallic color scheme, ideal for casual wear and light workouts. Its stylish look is complemented by a soft knit upper, providing a comfy fit. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 sports a more robust design with a White/Black/Rose Gold palette, appealing to those who prefer a bolder aesthetic. The double jacquard air mesh upper of the Brooks model not only enhances its visual appeal but also boosts breathability, making it suitable for a variety of activities beyond just running.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the adidas Womens Swift Run is designed for all-day wear, boasting a lightweight EVA midsole that delivers step-absorbing cushioning. However, it’s important to note that this shoe runs big, so potential buyers are advised to purchase half a size smaller. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 provides an impressive level of comfort with its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which enhances the soft feel and support during longer runs. The Brooks model is crafted to accommodate both runners and walkers, offering reliable comfort throughout various activities.
Cushioning Technology
Cushioning is a critical aspect of running shoes, and both models present distinct approaches. The adidas Womens Swift Run utilizes a lightweight EVA midsole for cushioning, promoting durability and comfort. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 takes cushioning to another level with its premium nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 technology, offering a softer and more dynamic feel with every step. This model also includes additional cushioning in the heel and forefoot, making it ideal for those who prioritize a cushioned ride during their workouts.
Breathability
Breathability is essential for comfort during exercise, and here the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 excels with its double jacquard air mesh upper, which allows for optimal airflow. This feature helps keep feet cool and dry, especially during intense activities. The adidas Womens Swift Run, while comfortable, may not provide the same level of breathability due to its knit upper. Thus, for those who sweat heavily or engage in long-distance runs, the Brooks model is likely the better choice.
Versatility and Usage
The adidas Womens Swift Run is primarily designed for casual wear and light workouts, making it an excellent choice for those who prioritize style and comfort for everyday use. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 is geared towards serious runners, offering features that support various forms of exercise including road running, walking, and cross training. The Brooks model’s versatility is enhanced by its certification as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, further broadening its appeal for users with specific foot health needs.
Price and Value
In terms of price, the adidas Womens Swift Run is positioned at $79.95, making it about 27% less expensive than the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17, priced at $110.00. While the lower price point of the adidas model may attract budget-conscious buyers, it's important to consider the value derived from the Brooks shoe’s advanced features and technologies. For serious runners, the investment in the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 may be justified given its superior cushioning, breathability, and versatility.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the adidas Womens Swift Run and the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you are looking for a stylish and budget-friendly option for casual wear or light workouts, the adidas model is a great choice at $79.95. However, if you need a shoe that offers advanced cushioning, breathability, and versatility for serious running or walking, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 at $110.00 is likely worth the investment. Consider your primary activities and foot comfort preferences when making your decision.

