ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe, vs ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
Updated August 2026 — ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe, wins on weight and style, ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on support and fit.
The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 offers better stability and sustainability, making it the preferred choice for most runners.
Why ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe, is better
Price
ALTRA is slightly more expensive at $99.99 compared to ASICS at $99.95.
Color
ALTRA offers a vibrant light blue color.
Weight
ALTRA features a lightweight midsole foam.
Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better
Stability
ASICS has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for better stability.
Sustainability
ASICS uses recycled materials in its construction.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a better sales rank at 9,491.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe, | ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ALTRA | ASICS |
| Color | Light Blue | Black/White |
| Midsole | Altra EGO P35 | Rearfoot PureGEL |
| Upper | Mesh | Jacquard Mesh |
| Stability | None | 3D GUIDANCE |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe is priced at $99.99, while the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe is slightly less at $99.95. This makes the ASICS model about 0.04% cheaper than the ALTRA shoe, a negligible difference that may not significantly influence your decision. Both shoes are within the same price range, which is common for quality running shoes. However, given their similar price points, other factors such as comfort, design, and features will likely play a larger role in your choice.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 features a light blue color, offering a fresh and vibrant look that stands out during runs. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 comes in a classic black and white color scheme, providing a timeless appeal that can easily match various athletic wear. The choice here ultimately depends on personal style preferences; while the ALTRA offers a more eye-catching option, the ASICS caters to those who prefer a subdued, versatile look. Both shoes boast a modern design suitable for both performance and casual wear.
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is a crucial aspect of any running shoe, and both options strive to excel in this area. The ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 is designed with Altra EGO P35, a lightweight midsole foam that promotes an effortless and efficient underfoot feel. It also features a rocker shape that aids in propulsion with each step, making it appealing for long-distance runners. Conversely, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 employs a jacquard mesh upper that provides a supportive and comfortable foothold. Its sockliner is produced using a solution dyeing process, which not only enhances comfort but also promotes sustainability by reducing water usage and carbon emissions.
Technology and Features
When it comes to technology, both running shoes incorporate innovative features. The ALTRA model's rocker shape is designed to enhance your natural stride while keeping you feeling propelled forward. This attention to natural movement can be a game-changer for those who prioritize efficiency in their runs. On the other hand, the ASICS shoe is equipped with a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that offers advanced stability, along with Rearfoot PureGEL technology that delivers lightweight cushioning and softer landings. This combination may appeal more to runners seeking extra support and stability, particularly on uneven surfaces.
Sustainability
Sustainability is increasingly important in today’s market, and the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 has made strides in this area. At least 50% of the shoe's main upper material is made with recycled content, significantly reducing waste and carbon emissions during production. Additionally, the eco-friendly sockliner contributes to lower water usage and carbon output. The ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 does not explicitly mention any sustainable materials, which may be a consideration for environmentally-conscious consumers. If sustainability is a priority for you, the ASICS model clearly stands out.
Performance and Sales Rank
Performance is often reflected in a shoe's sales rank, and the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 has a better rank at 9,491 compared to the ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2, which is at 17,104. This indicates that the ASICS shoe is likely more popular among consumers, potentially due to its mix of comfort, stability, and brand reputation. For those who prioritize a well-regarded performance shoe, the ASICS may be the more prudent choice based on sales data.
Customer Reviews and Reputation
While specific customer reviews are not provided in the data, the sales rank can be a proxy for customer satisfaction. The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13, with its higher sales rank, suggests that it has garnered favorable attention from consumers, possibly due to its stability and comfort features. The ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2, while also a solid option, may not have captured the same level of consumer interest. If you lean towards a product with a proven track record, the ASICS model appears to have the edge in terms of customer acceptance.
Which should you buy?
In summary, both the ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 and the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 are excellent choices in the running shoe category, each with its unique strengths. The ALTRA offers a lightweight and efficient underfoot experience, ideal for those who value natural movement. Meanwhile, the ASICS shoe excels in stability, comfort, and sustainability, making it better suited for runners who require extra support. Given the slight price difference and better sales rank, the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 may be the better buy for most consumers seeking a reliable running shoe. Ultimately, the choice will depend on your specific running needs and preferences.

