ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe, vs ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes, 8,
Updated August 2026 — ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe, wins on comfort and fit, ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes, 8, wins on traction and breathability.
The ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 offers a more budget-friendly option with a focus on natural fit, while the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 excels in breathability and energy-saving technologies.
Why ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe, is better
Price
ALTRA is $34.96 cheaper
Fit
ALTRA has a spacious FootShape fit
Sales Rank
ALTRA has a better sales rank of 17,104
Why ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes, 8, is better
Cushioning
ASICS features FF BLAST PLUS cushioning
Breathability
ASICS has a mesh upper for better airflow
Outsole
ASICS has ASICSGRIP for advanced grip
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe, | ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes, 8, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ALTRA | ASICS |
| Price | $99.99 | $134.95 |
| Sales Rank | 17104 | 22313 |
| Cushioning | Altra EGO P35 | FF BLAST PLUS |
| Upper | Not specified | Mesh |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When considering price, the ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe is significantly more budget-friendly at $99.99 compared to the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 Running Shoes, which are priced at $134.95. This difference of $34.96 makes the ALTRA shoe about 26% cheaper. If you're looking for a quality running shoe without breaking the bank, the ALTRA option offers an attractive price point, especially since its price has a historical average of $109.67 over the past 90 days. In contrast, the ASICS Noosa TRI 16 has maintained a consistent price, averaging $134.95, which might not appeal to those seeking a bargain.
Design and Aesthetics
The aesthetic appeal of running shoes can significantly influence buyers' choices. The ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 features a light blue color that is both fresh and versatile, suitable for various running environments. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 showcases a vibrant cobalt burst and sky design, aimed at those who prefer bold, energetic styles. This striking appearance might attract runners who enjoy standing out. While both shoes offer distinct looks, the choice largely depends on personal style preference.
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is paramount in running shoes, and both the ALTRA and ASICS models cater to this need. The ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 utilizes Altra EGO P35 foam, designed for a lightweight and comfortable underfoot feel. Its signature FootShape fit allows for ample toe space, promoting natural movement. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 emphasizes cushioning through its FF BLAST PLUS technology, providing soft impact absorption. The mesh upper enhances breathability, ensuring your feet remain cool during runs. Runners might prefer the ALTRA for its spacious fit or the ASICS for its plush cushioning, depending on their individual needs.
Performance Features
In terms of performance, both shoes incorporate advanced technologies to enhance the running experience. The ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 features a rocker shape that propels the runner forward, optimizing toe-off efficiency while maintaining a natural stride. Meanwhile, the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 includes GUIDESOLE technology, designed to improve energy efficiency during runs. This feature aids in achieving smooth toe-offs, potentially making it a better choice for runners focused on speed and efficiency. The choice here will depend on whether you prioritize a natural running style or energy conservation.
Breathability and Weight
Breathability plays a crucial role in keeping your feet comfortable during long runs. The ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 is designed with a mesh upper that enhances airflow, making it an excellent choice for warm weather or high-intensity training. The ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2, while also comfortable, does not highlight breathability in its features. In terms of weight, the ALTRA shoe is constructed with lightweight materials, but specific weight details are not provided. If breathability is a critical factor for you, the ASICS may have the upper hand.
Durability and Outsole Performance
Durability is essential for any running shoe, particularly for frequent runners. The ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 focuses on delivering an efficient underfoot feel, but specific details about the outsole's durability are not mentioned. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 features an ASICSGRIP outsole, which is designed to provide advanced grip across various terrains, suggesting a more robust performance in diverse conditions. This could make the ASICS a better option for runners who encounter different surfaces during their workouts.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
Brand reputation can influence purchasing decisions, and both ALTRA and ASICS are respected names in the running community. The ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 holds a sales rank of 17,104, indicating a solid, albeit niche, popularity. In comparison, the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 ranks at 22,313, suggesting that while both brands have their dedicated following, the ALTRA shoe may currently resonate more with consumers. Brand loyalty and community feedback can be significant factors for buyers when choosing between these two options.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 and the ASICS Women's Noosa TRI 16 comes down to personal preferences and priorities. If you are looking for a more budget-friendly option with a focus on natural foot movement and spacious fit, the ALTRA shoe at $99.99 is a compelling choice. However, if you prefer a stylish design with advanced energy-saving technologies and superior breathability, the ASICS model at $134.95 may be worth the additional investment. Consider your running style, budget, and aesthetic preferences to determine which shoe aligns best with your needs.

