ALTRA Women's Experience Form Road Running Shoe, Gray, 9 vs ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,
Updated August 2026 — ALTRA Women's Experience Form Road Running Shoe, Gray, 9 wins on weight, ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, wins on cushioning and fit.
The ALTRA Women's Experience Form offers a budget-friendly option with lightweight performance, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 excels in cushioning and stability.
Why ALTRA Women's Experience Form Road Running Shoe, Gray, 9 is better
Price
ALTRA is $35 cheaper than ASICS
Weight
ALTRA is designed for lightweight performance
Sales Rank
ALTRA has a higher sales rank than ASICS
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, is better
Cushioning
ASICS features advanced FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning
Stability
ASICS has 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for adaptive stability
Breathability
ASICS includes an engineered mesh upper for better airflow
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ALTRA Women's Experience Form Road Running Shoe, Gray, 9 | ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ALTRA | ASICS |
| Model | Experience Form | Gel-Kayano 31 |
| Upper | Standard | Engineered Mesh |
| Cushioning | EVA Foam | FF BLAST PLUS ECO |
| Stability Tech | GuideRail | 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the ALTRA Women's Experience Form Road Running Shoe is significantly more affordable than the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes. The ALTRA shoe is priced at $89.99, while the ASICS model retails for $124.95, making the ASICS about 39% more expensive. This price difference may be a crucial factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes without breaking the bank.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 excels with its advanced cushioning technologies. It features FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning and Rearfoot PureGEL technology, which provide a cloud-like comfort and softer landings, making it ideal for long-distance runners. On the other hand, the ALTRA Women's Experience Form offers a responsive midsole with compression-molded EVA foam that encourages an effortless feel. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the ASICS model's more sophisticated cushioning system sets it apart for those who prioritize plushness during their runs.
Stability Features
Stability is a key consideration for runners, and both shoes offer unique support systems. The ALTRA Women's Experience Form uses GuideRail technology to promote natural foot placement, especially beneficial for overpronators. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 incorporates the 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, which adapts to the runner’s stride, providing additional stability. This feature may appeal to runners who require a more tailored fit and support during their runs. The ASICS shoe’s advanced stability technology could be a deciding factor for those with specific gait concerns.
Breathability
Breathability plays a crucial role in keeping your feet comfortable during runs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 includes an engineered mesh upper that significantly improves airflow, making it a better choice for warmer weather or long-distance runs. While the ALTRA Women's Experience Form does not specify its breathability features, it is designed for lightweight performance. However, the explicit breathability of the ASICS model may offer an edge for those who tend to sweat more during their workouts, especially on hot days.
Design and Aesthetics
Aesthetic appeal can influence a buyer's decision, and both shoes present distinct styles. The ALTRA Women's Experience Form comes in a sleek gray color, providing a versatile look that can pair well with various athletic outfits. Meanwhile, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 is available in a vibrant Coffee/NOVA Orange color, which may attract runners looking for a more eye-catching option. Ultimately, the choice between these designs will depend on personal preference, but both brands have created visually appealing running shoes.
Weight and Performance
The ALTRA Women's Experience Form is designed for lightweight performance, making it a suitable option for runners seeking speed. Its lightweight construction enhances efficiency during runs, potentially leading to improved performance. While the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 does not explicitly mention its weight, the focus on cushioning and stability suggests it may be slightly heavier. Runners who prioritize speed and agility might lean towards the ALTRA shoe, while those valuing comfort and support may prefer the ASICS model despite any potential increase in weight.
Sales Rankings
Both shoes have respectable sales rankings, with the ALTRA Women's Experience Form ranking at 25,604 and the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 slightly lower at 26,176. While neither shoe is categorized as a top bestseller, they both indicate a strong presence in the market. The ALTRA model's slightly higher ranking could suggest a favorable reception among consumers, potentially making it a more popular choice among runners looking for quality at a lower price point.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ALTRA Women's Experience Form and the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 ultimately depends on your specific running needs and budget. If you're looking for a budget-friendly option that emphasizes lightweight performance and natural foot placement, the ALTRA shoe is a compelling choice at $89.99. However, if you prefer advanced cushioning, stability features, and enhanced breathability, the ASICS shoe, although more expensive at $124.95, may provide the comfort and support you need for longer runs.

