ALTRA Women's Experience Form Road Running Shoe, Gray, 9 vs Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated July 2026 — ALTRA Women's Experience Form Road Running Shoe, Gray, 9 wins on stability and weight, Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on versatility and price.
The ALTRA Women's Experience Form offers a budget-friendly option with innovative stability features, while the Brooks Women's Ghost 17 excels in comfort and versatility.
Why ALTRA Women's Experience Form Road Running Shoe, Gray, 9 is better
Price
ALTRA is $20 cheaper than Brooks
Weight
ALTRA is designed to be lightweight
Stability
ALTRA features GuideRail technology for overpronators
Why Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks has premium nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning
Breathability
Brooks features a double jacquard air mesh upper
Versatility
Brooks is suitable for various activities beyond running
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ALTRA Women's Experience Form Road Running Shoe, Gray, 9 | Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ALTRA | Brooks |
| Model | Experience Form | Ghost 17 |
| Price | $89.99 | $110.00 |
| Weight | Lightweight | Moderate |
| Cushioning | EVA Foam | DNA Loft v3 |
| Breathability | Not specified | Double Jacquard |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the ALTRA Women's Experience Form Road Running Shoe is significantly more economical than the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17. The ALTRA shoe is priced at $89.99, while the Brooks model retails for $110.00, making the ALTRA about 18% cheaper. For budget-conscious buyers, this price difference can be a crucial factor, especially if the shoes will be used for regular running or walking.
Comfort and Cushioning
Both shoes are designed with comfort in mind, but they offer different cushioning experiences. The Brooks Ghost 17 is known for its premium nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which enhances softness and comfort over long distances. This feature ensures that every mile feels as good as the first, making it an excellent choice for everyday runners. On the other hand, the ALTRA Experience Form utilizes compression-molded EVA foam, which provides a lightweight and responsive feel. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks model’s advanced cushioning technology may appeal more to runners seeking a plush ride.
Stability Features
In terms of stability, the ALTRA Women’s Experience Form incorporates GuideRail technology, which assists overpronators by gently guiding foot placement without being intrusive. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who require additional support during their runs. Conversely, the Brooks Ghost 17 offers neutral support, making it suitable for a wider range of foot types. While both shoes aim to provide stability, the ALTRA's targeted support for overpronators sets it apart for those with specific gait issues.
Breathability
Breathability is an essential characteristic for running shoes, especially during intense workouts. The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 excels in this area with its double jacquard air mesh upper, designed to optimize airflow and keep feet cool and dry. In contrast, the ALTRA Women’s Experience Form does not specify its breathability features, making it less clear how it performs in hot conditions. For runners who prioritize ventilation, the Brooks might be the more suitable option.
Weight and Performance
The ALTRA Women's Experience Form is designed to be lightweight, promoting an effortless running experience. Its lightweight build is complemented by a rocker shape that enhances propulsion with each step. This design encourages efficient toe-off, which can help improve running performance. While the Brooks Ghost 17 is also crafted for comfort, its additional cushioning may add some weight. Therefore, for those seeking a performance edge, the ALTRA could be a better fit.
Versatility
The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 is marketed as a versatile shoe suitable for various activities, including road running, walking, cross-training, and gym workouts. With its certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe status and APMA Seal of Acceptance, it demonstrates a broader applicability. On the other hand, while the ALTRA Women’s Experience Form is primarily focused on running, its lightweight design may not offer the same level of versatility for different fitness routines. For consumers looking for a multi-purpose shoe, the Brooks may be the more compelling choice.
Aesthetic Appeal
Aesthetics can play a significant role in a buyer's decision. The Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 features a stylish white, black, and rose gold color scheme, which may appeal to those who want their running shoes to look good both on and off the track. In contrast, the ALTRA Women’s Experience Form comes in a more subdued gray color. While beauty is subjective, those who wish for their shoes to make a fashion statement might lean towards the Brooks model.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ALTRA Women's Experience Form Road Running Shoe and the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 boils down to individual needs and preferences. The ALTRA offers a more budget-friendly option with innovative stability features and a lightweight design, making it ideal for dedicated runners focusing on performance. However, the Brooks Ghost 17 shines with its advanced cushioning, breathability, and versatility, making it suitable for various activities beyond just running. If budget is your primary concern, the ALTRA is the way to go. But if you prioritize comfort, support, and multi-functionality, the Brooks may justify its higher price.

