ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive leads on breathability and fit.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 offers superior support and cushioning, making it the better choice for most runners. The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA is ideal for those seeking a lightweight shoe focused on foot health.
Why ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5 is better
Price
ALTRA is slightly cheaper at $99.97.
Foot Health
ALTRA promotes good foot health with APMA Seal.
Lightweight
ALTRA is designed for a lightweight experience.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better
Support
Brooks features Guiderails for enhanced stability.
Cushioning
Brooks uses nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 for comfort.
Sales Rank
Brooks has a significantly higher sales rank.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5 | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ALTRA | Brooks |
| Model | FWD VIA | Adrenaline GTS 24 |
| Cushion Type | Altra EGO FLO | DNA Loft v3 |
| APMA Seal | Yes | Yes |
| Upper Material | Not specified | Engineered air mesh |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe
The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe is priced at $99.97 and is designed to promote good foot health, earning the American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) Seal of Acceptance. This shoe incorporates Altra EGO FLO supercritical midsole foam, providing a lightweight and cushioned experience for runners. It features a rocker shape that propels the wearer forward with each step, making it suitable for those looking to enhance their running efficiency. With a sales rank of 23,294, it may appeal to those seeking comfort and health benefits in their running shoes.
Overview of Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is priced at $98.95, making it about $1.02 cheaper than the ALTRA Women's FWD VIA. This shoe is designed for support and comfort, featuring nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning that adapts to the runner’s stride. It also holds the APMA Seal of Acceptance and is recognized as a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe. With a sales rank of 1,047, it is significantly more popular than the ALTRA model, indicating its strong reception among runners looking for reliable support.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the ALTRA Women's FWD VIA employs Altra EGO FLO midsole foam for a soft underfoot feel, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 uses nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning. Both shoes are designed to provide plush comfort, but the Brooks model emphasizes dynamic cushioning that adapts to individual strides, potentially offering a more personalized experience. The Adrenaline GTS 24's advanced comfort technology may appeal to those who prioritize a plush feel over time, while the FWD VIA focuses on a lightweight and responsive design.
Support and Stability
When it comes to support, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 stands out with its Guiderails Holistic Support System, designed to help maintain the body’s natural motion path while controlling excess movement. This feature might be particularly beneficial for runners who require additional stability and support during their runs. The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA, while also promoting good foot health, does not highlight a specific stability feature, potentially making it less suitable for those who need extra support during their activities.
Breathability and Fit
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features an engineered air mesh upper that provides breathability, stretch, and a structured fit. This design can enhance comfort during longer runs by allowing for better airflow and accommodating foot movement. On the other hand, the ALTRA Women's FWD VIA does not specify its upper material but focuses on providing a comfortable and cushioned experience. Runners in warmer climates or those who prioritize ventilation may find the Brooks model more appealing due to its breathable upper design.
Transition and Performance
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 promotes smooth transitions thanks to its newly designed outsole and midsole, which can help runners maintain their momentum more effectively. This feature is particularly advantageous for those who engage in longer runs or training sessions. In comparison, the ALTRA Women's FWD VIA emphasizes a rocker shape that propels the wearer forward, which may also enhance performance but could be more suited for shorter, quicker runs. The choice between the two may depend on the runner's specific needs regarding transition and performance during different types of runs.
Price Comparison
In terms of pricing, the ALTRA Women's FWD VIA is listed at $99.97, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 comes in slightly lower at $98.95, making it about 1% cheaper. This small price difference may not sway many buyers; however, considering the Brooks model's higher sales rank and features, it may represent better value for those looking for a supportive running shoe. The overall cost-effectiveness of each shoe could influence the purchasing decision for budget-conscious runners.
Which should you buy?
Both the ALTRA Women's FWD VIA and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 are excellent choices, but they cater to slightly different needs. If you prioritize dynamic cushioning and stability, the Brooks model may be the better option for you, especially given its higher sales rank and innovative support features. Conversely, if you're looking for a lightweight shoe that promotes foot health and a natural stride, the ALTRA Women's FWD VIA could be the right fit. Ultimately, your choice should align with your specific running style and comfort preferences.

