vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, vs ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, wins on flexibility and style, ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on price and cushioning.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 offers great value and comfort, while the GT-2000 13 excels in advanced features and sustainability.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, is better

Price

Gel-Contend 9 is $35 cheaper

Weight

Gel-Contend 9 is lighter

Flexibility

Gel-Contend 9 has better flexibility

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better

Cushioning

GT-2000 13 has superior cushioning technology

Stability

GT-2000 13 features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM

Sustainability

GT-2000 13 uses recycled materials

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,
75
ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
BrandASICSASICS
Upper MaterialPolyesterJacquard Mesh
Cushioning TechRearfoot GELRearfoot PureGEL
SustainabilityNoYes
Sales Rank11559491

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White

Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes are priced at $64.95, making them about 35% cheaper than the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, which retails for $99.95. This model offers a combination of comfort and style, featuring a sleek polyester upper that enhances breathability and durability. With Rearfoot GEL technology, it provides improved impact absorption, making it suitable for various terrains. The shoe also includes an OrthoLite sockliner for added comfort and synthetic rubber outsole that ensures stability.

Overview of ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe

The ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe is priced at $99.95, offering advanced features aimed at providing superior performance. This model is designed with a Jacquard mesh upper that not only provides a supportive foothold but is also made with at least 50% recycled material, contributing to reduced waste and carbon emissions. The shoe features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for enhanced stability and Rearfoot PureGEL technology to ensure lightweight cushioning. This model is suitable for runners seeking a balance of comfort and environmental responsibility.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, both shoes excel, but they utilize different technologies. The Gel-Contend 9 incorporates Rearfoot GEL technology to enhance impact absorption and offers an EVA insole for comfort. In contrast, the GT-2000 13 uses Rearfoot PureGEL technology, which provides lightweight cushioning and softer landings. The Gel-Contend 9 focuses on a plush feel with its OrthoLite sockliner, while the GT-2000 13 emphasizes a more responsive experience with its innovative materials designed to reduce water usage and carbon emissions during production.

Support and Stability

Support and stability are critical factors for any running shoe. The Gel-Contend 9 includes synthetic stitching on the overlays for improved support and a flex groove outsole that enhances flexibility. On the other hand, the GT-2000 13 features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that offers advanced stability, ideal for those who require additional support during their runs. The focus of the Gel-Contend 9 is on general comfort and flexibility, while the GT-2000 13 aims to provide a more structured experience tailored for serious runners.

Environmental Considerations

The GT-2000 13 stands out with its commitment to environmental sustainability. At least 50% of its upper material is made from recycled content, which significantly reduces waste and carbon emissions. Additionally, its sockliner is produced using a solution dyeing process that minimizes water usage by approximately 33% compared to conventional methods. The Gel-Contend 9 does not highlight any similar sustainability features, making the GT-2000 13 a better choice for eco-conscious consumers.

Style and Aesthetics

In terms of style, both shoes offer appealing designs but cater to different tastes. The Gel-Contend 9 features a lilac and bluebell color scheme, presenting a more vibrant and playful aesthetic. Meanwhile, the GT-2000 13 comes in a classic black and white combination, appealing to those who prefer a more understated look. Both models maintain the sleek, athletic silhouette typical of ASICS running shoes, but personal preference for color and style will ultimately guide the buyer's choice.

Price Comparison

The Gel-Contend 9 is priced at $64.95, making it a more budget-friendly option compared to the GT-2000 13, which is priced at $99.95. This represents a price difference of about $35, or 35%. For casual runners or those just starting with their fitness journey, the Gel-Contend 9 offers excellent value without compromising on comfort. In contrast, the GT-2000 13 justifies its higher price with advanced technology and a commitment to sustainability, appealing to more serious runners or those willing to invest in a premium product.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and the GT-2000 13 ultimately depends on individual needs and preferences. If you're looking for an economical option that prioritizes comfort and flexibility, the Gel-Contend 9 is a solid choice at $64.95. However, if you seek advanced stability, superior cushioning, and a commitment to environmental sustainability, the GT-2000 13, priced at $99.95, may be worth the extra investment. Each shoe has its strengths, and your personal running style and budget will guide your decision.