ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, Lilac HINT/Bluebell vs Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium
Updated June 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, Lilac HINT/Bluebell wins on price and overall value, Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium wins on certifications & special features and cushioning.
The ASICS Gel-Contend 9 offers a significantly lower price and solid core performance, making it ideal for budget-conscious runners. The Brooks Ghost 17 justifies its higher cost with advanced cushioning, medical certifications, and eco-friendly features, appealing to serious runners and those with specific foot health needs.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, Lilac HINT/Bluebell is better
Price
ASICS Gel-Contend 9 is priced at $64.95, 41% cheaper than the Brooks Ghost 17's $110.00
Sales Rank
ASICS Gel-Contend 9 has a bestseller rank of 1,155, indicating strong market presence in its category
Breathability
Both shoes feature jacquard mesh uppers, but ASICS uses a polyester upper and lining for durability and airflow
Why Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium is better
Cushioning Technology
Brooks Ghost 17 uses nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 foam with 1mm extra heel and 3mm extra forefoot cushioning vs. ASICS' EVA and Amplifoam with rearfoot GEL
Certifications
Brooks Ghost 17 is a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and holds the APMA Seal of Acceptance, while ASICS has no such certifications
Outsole Innovation
Brooks Ghost 17 uses a recycled silica rubber compound for durability, lightweight performance, and responsive rebound, unlike ASICS' synthetic rubber outsole
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, Lilac HINT/Bluebell | Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Price | $64.95 | $110.00 |
| Cushioning Type | EVA insole, Amplifoam, rearfoot GEL technology | DNA LOFT v3 foam (nitrogen-infused), 1mm heel + 3mm forefoot extra |
| Upper Material | Jacquard mesh with polyester lining | Double jacquard air mesh with kick-back collar |
| Outsole Material | Synthetic rubber with Trusstic Technology | Recycled silica rubber compound |
| Medical Certifications | None | PDAC A5500 Diabetic, APMA Seal of Acceptance |
| Sustainability | No certification mentioned | Certified carbon neutral product |
| Bestseller Rank | 1,155 | 61 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison: ASICS Gel-Contend 9 vs. Brooks Ghost 17
The ASICS Gel-Contend 9 is about 41% cheaper than the Brooks Ghost 17, priced at $64.95 compared to $110.00. This significant price difference makes the ASICS model a more budget-friendly option for runners seeking reliable performance without a premium cost. The Brooks Ghost 17 commands a higher price point, reflecting its advanced cushioning technology and certifications, while the ASICS Gel-Contend 9 delivers core running features at a lower entry cost. For shoppers prioritizing affordability, the ASICS offers immediate savings of $45.05.
Cushioning Technology: ASICS Gel-Contend 9 vs. Brooks Ghost 17
The Brooks Ghost 17 features a more advanced cushioning system with DNA LOFT v3 foam, including an extra 1mm in the heel and 3mm in the forefoot compared to its predecessor. This enhanced cushioning provides lightweight softness and long-lasting comfort across every mile. In contrast, the ASICS Gel-Contend 9 relies on EVA insole and Amplifoam cushioning paired with rearfoot GEL technology for impact absorption. While both offer cushioned landings, the Brooks’ nitrogen-infused foam delivers a more dynamic, responsive feel, especially beneficial for longer runs or high-mileage training.
Support and Stability Features: ASICS Gel-Contend 9 vs. Brooks Ghost 17
The ASICS Gel-Contend 9 includes Trusstic Technology in its synthetic rubber outsole for improved stability, along with synthetic stitching on overlays to enhance support. These elements help maintain structural integrity during movement. The Brooks Ghost 17, however, emphasizes neutral support through its midsole design and incorporates a kick-back collar that adds structure and support around the ankle. Both shoes aim to stabilize the foot, but the Brooks’ focus on smooth transitions and adaptive fit suggests a more refined approach to dynamic support, particularly suited for daily use and varied terrain.
Upper Breathability and Fit: ASICS Gel-Contend 9 vs. Brooks Ghost 17
Both the ASICS Gel-Contend 9 and Brooks Ghost 17 feature jacquard mesh uppers designed for breathability. The ASICS uses a polyester upper and lining for durability and airflow, while the Brooks employs a double jacquard air mesh upper that enhances premium airflow and adapts to natural foot movement. The Brooks also includes a kick-back collar for added support and a snug fit, which may improve comfort during extended wear. The ASICS’ simpler construction still ensures good ventilation, but the Brooks’ layered mesh and collar design offer a more tailored, breathable experience.
Outsole Durability and Traction: ASICS Gel-Contend 9 vs. Brooks Ghost 17
The ASICS Gel-Contend 9 uses a synthetic rubber outsole with Trusstic Technology, promising durability and stability across various surfaces. The Brooks Ghost 17 features an innovative rubber compound made with recycled silica, combining durability, lightweight performance, and responsive rebound. This eco-conscious material choice supports both longevity and environmental responsibility. While both soles are built for road use, the Brooks’ recycled silica compound appears to offer a more modern, sustainable traction solution with enhanced responsiveness, potentially benefiting runners who prioritize eco-friendly materials and long-term wear.
Certification and Special Features: ASICS Gel-Contend 9 vs. Brooks Ghost 17
The Brooks Ghost 17 stands out with two key certifications: it’s a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and has earned the APMA Seal of Acceptance, indicating suitability for individuals with foot health concerns. It’s also a certified carbon neutral product, highlighting its environmental commitment. The ASICS Gel-Contend 9 does not mention any medical or sustainability certifications. These distinctions position the Brooks Ghost 17 as a more specialized, health-conscious, and environmentally responsible choice, appealing to runners with specific needs or values.
Bestseller Rank and Market Position: ASICS Gel-Contend 9 vs. Brooks Ghost 17
The Brooks Ghost 17 holds a bestseller rank of 61, significantly higher than the ASICS Gel-Contend 9’s rank of 1,155. This strong ranking reflects broader consumer demand and proven popularity in the market. The ASICS model, while functional and well-reviewed, operates in a less competitive tier. The Brooks Ghost 17’s consistent top-tier visibility suggests stronger brand trust and widespread adoption among runners seeking dependable, everyday performance footwear.
Which should you buy?
Choose the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 if you're looking for a budget-friendly, reliable running shoe with solid cushioning and breathability at $64.95—about 41% cheaper than the Brooks Ghost 17. It’s ideal for casual runners or those new to training who want dependable performance without a premium price. Opt for the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 if you value advanced cushioning with DNA LOFT v3 foam, superior breathability from a double jacquard mesh upper, and certifications like the APMA Seal of Acceptance and PDAC A5500 Diabetic approval. Priced at $110.00, it’s a higher-end choice backed by strong market demand (bestseller rank 61) and eco-conscious design, making it better suited for serious runners or those with specific foot health needs.

