ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, wins on cushioning and stability, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running wins on weight and price.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 offers superior cushioning and stability, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is lighter and more affordable.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, is better
Cushioning
ASICS features Rearfoot GEL technology for enhanced impact absorption.
Stability
ASICS has Trusstic Technology for better stability on mixed terrain.
Design
ASICS offers a vibrant colorway that appeals to many runners.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running is better
Price
New Balance is priced at $59.99, making it more budget-friendly.
Weight
New Balance is lightweight at just over 200 grams.
Fit
New Balance has a simple lace-up closure for easy adjustments.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Current Price | $64.95 | $59.99 |
| Sales Rank | 1155 | 3173 |
| Upper Material | Jacquard Mesh | Breathable Mesh |
| Outsole | Synthetic Rubber | Durable Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When comparing prices, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe is about 17% cheaper than the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes. The ASICS model is priced at $64.95, while the New Balance option retails for $59.99. This price difference could be a deciding factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes. Both shoes offer great features, but the lower price of the New Balance model makes it an attractive option for those who want to save money without sacrificing performance.
Comfort and Cushioning
Both the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 prioritize comfort, but they achieve it in different ways. The ASICS model features Rearfoot GEL technology, which enhances impact absorption, creating a softer feel during footstrike. The Ortholite sockliner further boosts step-in comfort. Conversely, the Fresh Foam cushioning of the New Balance shoe provides responsive comfort that caters to long-distance runners. This makes the ASICS model particularly appealing for those who need extra cushioning, while the New Balance may be better suited for those who prefer a more responsive feel.
Breathability
In terms of breathability, both models excel, but their designs differ. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 includes a jacquard mesh upper that improves airflow, ensuring your feet remain cool during runs. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 also features a breathable mesh upper, which keeps your feet dry during cardio workouts. While both shoes offer good breathability, the specific mesh technology used in each provides a unique experience. Runners who prioritize ventilation may find both options suitable, but the ASICS model might have a slight edge due to its jacquard mesh design.
Weight and Design
Weight is another crucial factor for runners, and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 has a lightweight design at just over 200 grams, which can enhance agility and speed. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 does not specify its weight, but it is generally known to be slightly heavier due to its additional cushioning features. This weight difference could appeal to different types of runners; those seeking speed may prefer the New Balance model, while those who value cushioning and support may lean towards ASICS.
Outsole and Traction
Both running shoes are equipped with durable outsoles designed for traction. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 features a synthetic rubber outsole with Trusstic Technology, which provides excellent stability across various terrains. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 also includes a durable rubber outsole that ensures reliable traction. While both shoes promise good grip, the ASICS model may offer better stability for runners who tackle mixed terrain, whereas the New Balance may excel on flat surfaces.
Fit and Adjustability
When it comes to fit, both models offer features that enhance comfort and security. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is designed with synthetic stitching on the overlays to improve support, which could help keep your foot stable during runs. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 has a simple lace-up closure that allows for easy adjustments, ensuring a snug fit. Runners who need a more structured support might prefer the ASICS, while those who favor a customizable fit might find the New Balance to be more user-friendly.
Aesthetics
Aesthetics can play a significant role in a runner's choice of footwear. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 comes in a Lilac HINT/Bluebell colorway, which offers a stylish and fresh look. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9, on the other hand, is available in a Black/Castlerock/Metallic Rose combination, providing a more classic and versatile appearance. Ultimately, the choice will depend on personal style preferences, but both models have appealing designs that can fit various wardrobes.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 largely depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize cushioning, stability, and a slightly more vibrant design, the ASICS model may be the better choice for you. However, if you are looking for a lightweight, responsive shoe at a lower price point, the New Balance option stands out as an excellent value. Ultimately, both shoes offer unique benefits, making them suitable for different types of runners.

