vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, vs Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, wins on cushioning and durability, Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, wins on weight and style.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 offers superior cushioning and comfort, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is a more budget-friendly option with a lightweight design.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, is better

Cushioning

ASICS features rearfoot GEL technology for better impact absorption.

Comfort

OrthoLite sockliner provides exceptional step-in comfort.

Sales Rank

ASICS ranks higher at 1155 compared to Under Armour's 5952.

Why Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, is better

Price

Under Armour is $10 cheaper at $54.95.

Weight

Under Armour is lighter at 8.9 oz.

Versatility

Under Armour's design is more versatile for various outfits.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,
85
Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,
75

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,
Price$64.95$54.95
WeightN/A8.9 oz
Sales Rank11555952
Cushioning TypeRearfoot GELCharged Cushioning
Upper MaterialJacquard meshBreathable mesh

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,

Overview

When it comes to running shoes, comfort and durability play crucial roles for any runner. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 both offer unique features designed to enhance your running experience. With a price difference of $10 between them, the ASICS model is priced at $64.95 while the Under Armour option is available for $54.95, making it about 17% cheaper. This comparison will delve into their features, comfort, and overall performance to help you choose the right pair.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, both the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 present appealing aesthetics. The ASICS model features a lilac hue with a bluebell accent, offering a fresh and vibrant look. On the other hand, the Under Armour shoe comes in a classic black colorway, which many find versatile for various outfits. While the ASICS model emphasizes a sleek polyester upper for breathability, the Under Armour shoe employs a lightweight, breathable mesh upper with synthetic overlays, enhancing durability and support. These design choices reflect each brand's approach to combining style with performance.

Comfort and Fit

Comfort is paramount for runners, and both shoes bring unique qualities to the table. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 utilizes rearfoot GEL technology, which enhances impact absorption for a softer footstrike. Additionally, the OrthoLite sockliner offers exceptional step-in comfort, making it great for long runs. Meanwhile, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 features an EVA sockliner, providing a soft, cushioned feel with every step. With a weight of 8.9 oz, it is lightweight, further enhancing comfort. Both shoes cater to different preferences, with the ASICS focusing on cushioning and the Under Armour emphasizing a responsive feel.

Outsole and Traction

When it comes to traction and durability, the outsoles of both models are designed to withstand various terrains. The ASICS shoe has a synthetic rubber outsole with Trusstic Technology, which delivers exceptional stability. Its flex grooves improve flexibility, enhancing the overall running experience. Conversely, the Under Armour model features a solid rubber outsole that covers high-impact zones, designed for durability while maintaining a lightweight profile. This difference in design may cater to runners who prefer stability—the ASICS option—or those seeking lightweight agility with the Under Armour shoe.

Performance and Responsiveness

Performance is key for any running shoe, and both models offer impressive capabilities. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 ranks at 1155 on the bestseller list, indicating its popularity among consumers. The rearfoot GEL technology not only improves impact absorption but also creates a softer feeling at footstrike, ideal for longer distances. Meanwhile, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 boasts Charged Cushioning technology, which utilizes compression molded foam for ultimate responsiveness and durability. This makes it an excellent choice for runners looking for a versatile shoe. Despite their differences, both shoes aim to provide a comfortable and efficient running experience.

Breathability and Temperature Control

Breathability is another essential factor in running shoes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 incorporates a jacquard mesh upper that enhances airflow, keeping your feet cooler during runs. This feature is particularly beneficial for warmer climates or longer sessions. The Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 also focuses on breathability through its lightweight mesh upper, promoting airflow while maintaining durability and support. Both shoes are designed to keep feet dry and comfortable, but the specific materials used may resonate differently with individual preferences.

Price Point and Value

Price is always a consideration when making a purchase, and in this case, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is more budget-friendly at $54.95 compared to the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9, which retails for $64.95. This $10 difference might be significant for those on a tighter budget, making the Under Armour model a more accessible option. With its features and comfort level, the Charged Assert 10 offers strong value for its price, while the ASICS model presents slightly enhanced cushioning and support for those willing to invest a bit more.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 depends on your specific needs and preferences as a runner. If you prioritize superior cushioning and impact absorption, the ASICS model may be the better fit for you. Conversely, if you're looking for a lightweight, responsive shoe at a lower price point, the Under Armour option offers excellent value. Both shoes are designed to enhance your running experience, so consider what features matter most to you before making your decision.