vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe -

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on cushioning and fit, Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on style.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 offers advanced cushioning and comfort, while the Brooks Women's Anthem 7 provides excellent value and performance. Choose based on your budget and cushioning preference.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Cushioning

Advanced FF BLAST PLUS and PureGEL technologies

Sales Rank

Higher sales rank indicates popularity

Visibility

Reflective details for nighttime safety

Why Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Price

More economical at $84.93

Weight

Lighter design for performance

Breathability

Updated engineered air mesh upper

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
88
Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe -
82

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe -
BrandASICSBrooks
ModelGel-Cumulus 27Anthem 7
WeightLightLighter
UpperEngineered MeshAir Mesh
OutsoleFLUIDRIDESegmented Crash Pad

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is priced at $109.95, making it about 17% more expensive than the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7, which retails for $84.93. This price difference may influence budget-conscious buyers. The Brooks shoe offers a more economical option without sacrificing essential features for performance running. For those who prioritize cost, the Anthem 7 presents a compelling choice, allowing runners to invest in quality footwear without overspending.

Brand Reputation

ASICS and Brooks are both well-respected brands in the running community, known for their commitment to quality and performance. The ASICS brand is recognized for its innovative cushioning technologies, particularly in their Gel-Cumulus line, which ranks 8,263 in sales. Meanwhile, the Brooks brand is celebrated for blending comfort and performance, with the Anthem 7 achieving a better sales rank of 3,377. This indicates that more consumers are gravitating toward the Brooks model, possibly due to its reputation for comfortable, performance-oriented running shoes.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, both shoes deliver impressive cushioning. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 features FF BLAST PLUS technology for lightweight impact absorption and PureGEL technology that enhances softness and shock absorption. This combination aims to reduce stress on joints during runs. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 is equipped with lightweight DNA cushioning designed to decrease underfoot pressure, promoting an effortless running experience. Both shoes cater to comfort, but the ASICS model leans more heavily into advanced cushioning technologies, appealing to runners who prioritize a plush feel.

Breathability

Breathability is a key factor in running shoes, and both models excel in this area. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 features an engineered mesh upper that improves breathability and comfort. This design helps keep feet cool and comfortable during runs. Similarly, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 boasts an updated engineered air mesh upper, providing a balance of stretch and structure for optimal breathability. While both shoes offer breathable designs, the slight differences in their upper constructions may make the ASICS model feel more comfortable for longer runs, especially in warmer conditions.

Performance Features

Performance features set these shoes apart. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 incorporates a FLUIDRIDE outsole, designed to create smoother strides, enhancing overall running efficiency. The reflective details are also a plus for nighttime visibility. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 includes a Segmented Crash Pad, which adapts to the foot's landing for smooth transitions. This feature maximizes efficiency, crucial for runners focusing on performance. Thus, while both shoes contain performance-enhancing technologies, the ASICS model leans toward providing a plush ride, whereas the Brooks emphasizes a more dynamic running experience.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the ASICS Women’s Gel-Cumulus 27 presents a sleek look with a black and concrete color scheme, appealing to those who prefer a more understated aesthetic. The Brooks Women’s Anthem 7, with its white, black, and tan color palette, offers a more classic appearance. The choice between the two ultimately comes down to personal preference, as both brands maintain a modern look that aligns with current running shoe trends. Each shoe’s design reflects the brand’s identity while catering to diverse consumer tastes.

Fit and Sizing

Fit is crucial in running shoes, and both the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 come in a size 8.5. The ASICS model is designed to offer a snug fit, while its engineered mesh upper contributes to overall comfort. Conversely, the Brooks shoe emphasizes a comfortable heel fit, ensuring plushness for extended wear. For runners with specific fit preferences, trying on both models is advisable, as slight variances in design can significantly impact comfort during runs.

Which should you buy?

The choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 ultimately hinges on individual priorities. If budget is a primary concern, the Brooks model provides excellent value at $84.93, about 17% less than the ASICS shoe. However, for those seeking advanced cushioning technologies and a plush running experience, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27, priced at $109.95, may justify the higher cost. Both shoes offer superior comfort and performance, making either a solid choice based on your running style and preferences.