ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on performance and cushioning, Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on price and design.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 offers advanced cushioning and technology, while the Brooks Women's Anthem 8 is a budget-friendly option with solid performance. Choose based on your priorities.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
Advanced FF BLAST PLUS and PureGEL technologies
Performance
FLUIDRIDE outsole for smoother strides
Brand Reputation
Higher sales rank indicates popularity
Why Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
About 18% less expensive
Design
Vibrant color options
Breathability
Lightweight mesh upper for airflow
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $109.95 | $89.95 |
| Sales Rank | 8263 | 4355 |
| Cushion Tech | FF BLAST PLUS | DNA LOFT v2 |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Performance Mesh |
| Outsole Type | FLUIDRIDE | RoadTack Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes are priced at $109.95, while the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe is significantly cheaper at $89.95, making it about 18% less expensive than the ASICS model. For budget-conscious runners, this price difference could be a crucial deciding factor. Although the ASICS offers advanced cushioning technologies, the Brooks provides a solid option for those who want a comfortable shoe without breaking the bank.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 features a modern black and concrete color scheme that is both sleek and versatile. This model is designed with reflective details to enhance visibility, a practical choice for evening runs. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 sports a vibrant Atlantic Deep/Skyway/Pink color combination, appealing to those who appreciate a more colorful aesthetic. Both shoes are designed for comfort and style, but your personal preference for color and design may influence your choice.
Comfort and Cushioning
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 stands out for its FF BLAST PLUS technology, which provides lightweight impact absorption and a responsive rebound. The PureGEL technology enhances cushioning, making it an excellent choice for long-distance runners seeking maximum comfort. The Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 also offers substantial cushioning with its DNA LOFT v2 midsole foam, which is upgraded for a softer experience underfoot. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the ASICS model may offer a slight edge for serious runners looking for advanced cushioning.
Breathability
Breathability is a key factor for running shoes, especially in warmer weather. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 features an engineered mesh upper that improves breathability and comfort. Similarly, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 also has a lightweight performance mesh upper designed to enhance airflow and keep feet cool. Both models excel in this area, ensuring that runners can maintain comfort during their workouts. However, the specific technologies used may appeal differently depending on personal preferences for fit and feel.
Performance and Ride
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is equipped with a FLUIDRIDE outsole that helps create smoother strides, which is beneficial for runners who prioritize performance. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 features engineered midsole geometry that cradles the foot, promoting smooth transitions from heel to toe. This design is beneficial for beginners or those seeking a more casual running experience. Depending on your running style and experience level, one model may provide a performance edge over the other.
Durability and Traction
Both shoes offer durability, but they do so with different technologies. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 focuses on long-lasting cushioning and comfort, while the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 boasts a RoadTack rubber outsole that provides reliable traction on various surfaces. This feature is particularly useful for runners who frequently train on city streets or suburban sidewalks. If you plan to use your shoes on diverse terrains, the Brooks may offer an advantage in terms of grip and durability.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 has a sales rank of 8,263, while the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 is ranked higher at 4,355. This difference in sales rank can indicate that the Brooks model may be more popular among consumers, potentially reflecting better overall satisfaction or demand. Both brands are well-respected in the running community, but the sales rank may influence your decision if you value popularity and consumer feedback.
Which should you buy?
When deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8, consider your specific needs and preferences. If you're looking for advanced cushioning technology and don’t mind spending a bit more, the ASICS might be the better choice. However, if you're budget-conscious and seeking a stylish, comfortable shoe for casual fitness or beginner running, the Brooks offers excellent value at about 18% less. Ultimately, both shoes provide quality options for runners, but the right choice will depend on your individual priorities.

