ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on cushioning and performance, Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on price and weight.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 offers superior cushioning and advanced technology, while the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 is a more budget-friendly option with solid performance. Choose based on your priorities.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
ASICS features FF BLAST PLUS and PureGEL technologies.
Performance
ASICS has a FLUIDRIDE outsole for smoother strides.
Durability
ASICS is built with high-quality materials for longevity.
Why Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Brooks is $18.20 cheaper.
Weight
Brooks offers a lightweight design.
Breathability
Brooks has an engineered air mesh upper.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $109.95 | $91.75 |
| Bestseller Rank | 8263 | 12197 |
| Cushion Tech | FF BLAST PLUS | DNA LOFT v2 |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Air Mesh |
| Outsole Type | FLUIDRIDE | RoadTack Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes are priced at $109.95, making them a premium choice in the running shoe market. This model is designed for those seeking maximum cushioning and comfort while running. With a bestseller rank of 8,263, it is popular among runners who appreciate advanced technologies in footwear. The shoe features FF BLAST PLUS technology for lightweight impact absorption and PureGEL technology to enhance cushioning and soften landings, making it an excellent option for longer runs.
Overview of Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe
In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe is priced at $91.75, about 17% cheaper than the ASICS option. This shoe is designed to provide maximum comfort for runners, featuring DNA LOFT v2 soft cushioning that adapts to the wearer's stride. With a bestseller rank of 12,197, it is slightly less popular than the ASICS model but still offers significant value for money. The breathable mesh upper ensures a secure fit, enhancing the overall running experience.
Comfort and Cushioning Comparison
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 excels with its combination of FF BLAST PLUS and PureGEL technologies, providing both impact absorption and a responsive feel. This results in a softer landing and reduced stress on joints, making it suitable for longer distances. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 employs DNA LOFT v2 cushioning that is lightweight yet adaptable, offering a smooth transition from heel to toe. Both models prioritize comfort, but the ASICS shoe may offer a slightly more cushioned experience due to its dual technology approach.
Breathability and Fit
Breathability is another critical factor for running shoes, and both models deliver in this area. The ASICS shoe features an engineered mesh upper that enhances ventilation and comfort, ideal for warm weather runs. Similarly, the Brooks Trace 4 is equipped with an engineered air mesh upper that promotes airflow, keeping feet dry and comfortable during extended wear. While both shoes offer excellent breathability, the ASICS model's specific focus on comfort may provide an edge for some runners.
Performance on the Road
Performance metrics show that the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is designed for smoother strides, aided by its FLUIDRIDE outsole. This design helps runners maintain pace and efficiency, particularly over long distances. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 includes a segmented crash pad that absorbs impact and ensures a smooth transition during runs. While both shoes are engineered for performance, the ASICS model’s focus on stride smoothness may appeal more to those looking for a premium experience.
Durability and Construction
Durability is vital for running shoes, and both brands are known for their quality construction. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 uses high-quality materials that increase its longevity, making it a worthy investment for serious runners. The Brooks Trace 4 features a RoadTack rubber outsole, designed to be durable and lightweight, utilizing recycled materials to enhance sustainability. While both shoes promise durability, the ASICS model may offer a more robust build that withstands the test of time, especially for frequent runners.
Price and Value for Money
Price is a significant factor in any purchase decision. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is priced at $109.95, while the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 is available for $91.75. This represents a price difference of about $18.20, making the Brooks model the more budget-friendly option. However, the ASICS shoe's advanced technologies and higher bestseller rank suggest that some runners may find the additional cost justifiable for the benefits offered. Ultimately, the choice may come down to individual budget constraints versus the desire for premium features.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 depends on your running needs and budget. If you prioritize maximum cushioning, advanced technology, and a slightly more robust construction, the ASICS model may be the better choice for you, despite its higher price. However, if you're looking for a more economical option that still provides comfort and performance, the Brooks Trace 4 offers incredible value without sacrificing quality. Each shoe has its merits, making your choice a reflection of your personal preferences and running style.

