ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on comfort and cushioning.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 offers better breathability and visibility, while the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 provides maximum cushioning at a lower price.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Breathability
Engineered mesh upper enhances airflow.
Visibility
Reflective details improve safety in low light.
Weight
Lightest model in its series for better responsiveness.
Why Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9 is better
Price
Slightly cheaper option for budget-conscious buyers.
Cushioning
Maximum cushioning for enhanced comfort.
Sales Rank
Higher sales rank indicates broader market appeal.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Saucony |
| Current Price | $109.95 | $106.61 |
| Cushioning Tech | FF BLAST PLUS | PWRRUN PB |
| Upper Design | Engineered Mesh | Standard |
| Outsole Tech | FLUIDRIDE | CENTER PATH |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and Saucony Women's Hurricane 24
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is priced at $109.95, while the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 comes in slightly cheaper at $106.61, making it about 3% less expensive. Both shoes are designed for runners seeking comfort and support, but they employ different technologies to achieve that goal. The Gel-Cumulus 27 focuses on lightweight cushioning and breathability, whereas the Hurricane 24 emphasizes maximum cushioning and protection.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is a defining feature of both running shoes, but they approach it in distinct ways. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 uses FF BLAST PLUS technology to offer lightweight impact absorption, making it ideal for long runs. Its PureGEL technology further enhances cushioning for softer landings, providing a plush feel. In contrast, the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 is built around a maximum cushioning concept, utilizing PWRRUN PB and ORTHOLITE technologies to deliver profound comfort and protection. This makes it particularly suitable for runners who prioritize a cushioned experience over extended distances.
Breathability and Upper Design
Breathability is crucial for comfort during runs, and the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 shines in this area with its engineered mesh upper. This design promotes airflow, helping to keep feet cooler and more comfortable over longer periods. The Saucony Women's Hurricane 24, while also comfortable, does not emphasize breathability to the same extent. Its focus is on maximum protection and cushioning, which may result in a less breathable upper compared to the Gel-Cumulus 27.
Weight and Responsiveness
The weight of a running shoe can significantly affect performance. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is noted as the lightest and most padded model in its series, offering a responsive feel that enhances overall running efficiency. While the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 is designed for comfort, its focus on maximum cushioning may contribute to a heavier overall feel. Runners looking for a lighter option may prefer the Gel-Cumulus 27 for its balance of cushioning and responsiveness.
Outsole Performance
Outsole technology plays a critical role in how a shoe performs on different surfaces. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 features a FLUIDRIDE outsole designed to create smoother strides, which can be beneficial for runners seeking a fluid running experience. On the other hand, the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 employs CENTER PATH TECHNOLOGY aimed at providing stability and support. While both outsoles are engineered for performance, the Gel-Cumulus 27 may offer a slight edge for those prioritizing stride efficiency.
Visibility Features
Visibility is an important factor for runners who often run in low-light conditions. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 includes reflective details specifically designed to improve visibility, enhancing safety during early morning or evening runs. The Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 does not highlight any such features, which could be a consideration for safety-conscious runners. The Gel-Cumulus 27 may be the better option if visibility is a priority for your running routine.
Price and Value
In terms of pricing, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 retails for $109.95, while the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 is available at $106.61. This difference of about $3.34 means the Hurricane 24 is approximately 3% cheaper, providing a slight edge for budget-conscious consumers. However, both shoes offer unique value propositions based on their performance features and technologies, which should be considered beyond just price.
Sales Rank and Popularity
Sales rank can be a helpful indicator of a product’s popularity and consumer satisfaction. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 has a sales rank of 8,263, making it a strong contender among running shoes. In contrast, the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 has a higher sales rank at 21,932, which may suggest it is less popular or less frequently purchased. Consumers may wish to consider these rankings as part of their decision-making process, as they reflect broader market preferences.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 ultimately depends on individual preferences and needs. If you prioritize lightweight cushioning, breathability, and visibility, the Gel-Cumulus 27 is the better choice at $109.95. However, if maximum cushioning and a slightly lower price are more appealing, the Hurricane 24 at $106.61 fits the bill. Both shoes offer distinct advantages, so your decision should align with your specific running style and requirements.

