Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive vs Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9
Updated July 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive wins on price and support, Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9 wins on weight.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 offers superior support and cushioning, making it a better choice for serious runners, while the Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 is a more budget-friendly option.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive is better
Support
Brooks features GuideRails for enhanced stability.
Cushioning
Brooks uses nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 for better comfort.
Durability
Brooks has the APMA Seal of Acceptance for foot health.
Why Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9 is better
Price
Saucony is $26.38 cheaper.
Weight
Saucony may be lighter due to maximum cushioning.
Style
Saucony offers a classic appearance.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive | Saucony Women's Hurricane 24 Sneaker, White/Foam, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Saucony |
| Model | Adrenaline GTS 25 | Hurricane 24 |
| Price | $132.99 | $106.61 |
| Cushion Type | DNA LOFT v3 | PWRRUN PB |
| Support System | GuideRails | None |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 and Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 is priced at $132.99, while the Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 is significantly cheaper at $106.61, making it about 17% less expensive. This price difference may influence buyers looking for quality running shoes. Both shoes cater to different needs and preferences, making a direct comparison essential for potential buyers.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is a critical factor for any running shoe, and both models excel in this area. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 features nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, which provides a soft and dynamic feel, enhancing comfort mile after mile. In contrast, the Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 boasts maximum cushioning with a focus on comfort and protection through its innovative PWRRUN PB and ORTHOLITE technologies. While both shoes are designed for comfort, the Brooks model emphasizes a softer cushioning experience, while the Saucony aims for a more protective feel.
Support Features
Support is paramount for any runner, especially for those who require extra stability. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 is equipped with a holistic GuideRails support system that promotes natural motion while minimizing excess movement. This feature is crucial for runners seeking to prevent injuries. On the other hand, the Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 does not explicitly mention a support system like GuideRails but emphasizes its protective cushioning design. Runners requiring structured support may find the Brooks shoe more suitable.
Fit and Breathability
Fit and breathability play vital roles in the overall experience of running shoes. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 features a breathable engineered mesh upper that ensures a secure and comfortable fit, accommodating natural movement. The Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 also focuses on comfort but does not specify its upper material's breathability. The Brooks model arguably offers a better fit for those who prioritize both structure and flexibility, making it a strong contender for long-distance runners.
Weight and Performance
Weight can significantly impact running performance, and while specific weights are not provided, both shoes are designed for optimal performance. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 focuses on lightweight performance with its nitrogen-infused midsole, promoting a smooth ride. The Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24, with its maximum cushioning, may be slightly heavier but aims to protect the foot during runs. Runners looking for a lighter shoe may prefer the Brooks, while those prioritizing cushioning might lean toward the Saucony.
Durability and Longevity
Durability is a crucial consideration for any running shoe, as it affects the overall value. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 features a robust design that has earned the APMA Seal of Acceptance, indicating its suitability for good foot health. The Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24, while also built for durability, does not mention any specific endorsements. The Brooks shoe may provide added confidence in longevity, especially for those who log significant miles.
Style and Aesthetics
While performance is paramount, style also matters to many consumers. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 is available in a vibrant Spellbound/Blazing Bell/Pink colorway, appealing to those who appreciate a stylish look. The Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24, in White/Foam, offers a more classic appearance. Your preference for aesthetics may influence your decision, depending on whether you lean toward bold colors or a more understated style.
Price Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 is priced at $132.99, whereas the Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 is offered at $106.61. This represents a price difference of about $26.38, making the Saucony model a more budget-friendly option. However, the Brooks shoe's additional features and support capabilities may justify its higher price for some buyers. The decision may hinge on whether you're willing to invest more for enhanced support and cushioning.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 and the Saucony Women’s Hurricane 24 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize structured support, advanced cushioning, and breathability, the Brooks model is a solid choice despite its higher price. Conversely, if you’re looking for a more affordable option that still offers comfort and protection, the Saucony model may be the better fit. Both shoes are excellent in their own right, making the decision largely dependent on personal preference and running style.

