vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark Pink Clay/Orange Glow vs Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium

Updated June 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark Pink Clay/Orange Glow wins on price, Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium wins on brand reputation and target runner suitability.

The ASICS Gel-Excite 11 offers superior value with a $35.05 price advantage and excellent cushioning, while the Brooks Ghost 17 excels in specialized features like diabetic certification, carbon neutrality, and premium cushioning depth. Choose ASICS for affordability and comfort; choose Brooks for advanced health and environmental credentials.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark Pink Clay/Orange Glow is better

Price

ASICS Gel-Excite 11 is priced at $74.95, $35.05 less than Brooks Ghost 17's $110.00

Breathability

ASICS uses engineered mesh upper with reduced overlays, enhancing airflow without added structure

Cushioning Responsiveness

ASICS FF BLAST PLUS foam provides lighter, cloud-like cushioning with responsive rebound compared to standard AMPLIFOAM

Why Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium is better

Certifications

Brooks Ghost 17 is certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and carries APMA Seal of Acceptance

Environmental Impact

Brooks Ghost 17 is a certified carbon neutral product using recycled silica in its outsole

Cushioning Depth

Brooks Ghost 17 includes 1mm extra heel cushioning and 3mm extra forefoot cushioning vs. predecessor

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark Pink Clay/Orange Glow
68
Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium
82

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark Pink Clay/Orange GlowBrooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium
Midsole CushioningAMPLIFOAM PLUS + FF BLAST PLUSDNA LOFT v3 (nitrogen-infused)
Upper MaterialEngineered mesh (minimal overlays)Double jacquard air mesh with kick-back collar
Outsole CompoundFLUIDRIDERecycled silica rubber
Special CertificationsNone mentionedPDAC A5500 Diabetic, APMA Seal, Carbon Neutral
Sales Rank2,35261
Average Price (90 days)$74.94$135.83

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark Pink Clay/Orange GlowBrooks Women’s Ghost 17 Neutral Running Shoe - White/Black/Rose Gold - 8 Medium

Price Comparison

The ASICS Gel-Excite 11 is significantly more affordable than the Brooks Ghost 17, priced at $74.95 compared to $110.00. This represents a difference of $35.05, or about 32% less for the ASICS model. While the Brooks Ghost 17 has a higher average price over the past 90 days ($135.83), its current listing remains substantially above the ASICS option. For budget-conscious buyers seeking performance without premium pricing, the ASICS offers a clear value advantage.

Cushioning Technology

The ASICS Gel-Excite 11 uses AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning in the midsole, described as providing a softer and more comfortable ride than standard AMPLIFOAM. It also features FF BLAST PLUS foam, which delivers cloud-like cushioning with a responsive feel that is lighter than previous FF BLAST versions. In contrast, the Brooks Ghost 17 employs DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, a nitrogen-infused material designed for lightweight softness and long-lasting comfort. The Ghost 17 also includes an extra 1mm of cushioning in the heel and 3mm in the forefoot compared to its predecessor, enhancing overall comfort across every mile.

Support and Fit

Both shoes prioritize comfort and breathability, but they achieve it through different approaches. The ASICS Gel-Excite 11 features an engineered mesh upper that reduces the need for additional overlays, promoting breathability while maintaining structure. The Brooks Ghost 17 uses a double jacquard air mesh upper, which provides premium airflow and adapts to natural foot movement. Additionally, the Ghost 17 includes a kick-back collar for added support and stability. While neither shoe explicitly states arch support level, the Ghost 17’s design emphasizes a snug, adaptive fit, whereas the ASICS focuses on lightweight breathability with minimal structural overlays.

Outsole Durability and Performance

The ASICS Gel-Excite 11 incorporates a FLUIDRIDE outsole designed to create smoother strides, contributing to a more fluid running experience. The Brooks Ghost 17 features an innovative rubber compound made with recycled silica, offering durability, lightweight performance, and responsive rebound across various terrains. This outsole is specifically noted for balancing longevity and responsiveness, making it suitable for road running, walking, gym use, and travel. Both outsoles are built for daily wear, but the Ghost 17’s use of recycled materials adds an environmental benefit not mentioned in the ASICS model’s description.

Target Runner Profile

The ASICS Gel-Excite 11 is positioned as a versatile shoe for runners and those engaged in fitness routines, emphasizing underfoot comfort and a soft cushioned ride. It lacks specific mention of diabetic certification or environmental claims. The Brooks Ghost 17, however, is explicitly marketed as a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and carries the APMA Seal of Acceptance, indicating suitability for individuals with diabetes. It is also labeled as a certified carbon neutral product, appealing to environmentally conscious consumers. These certifications suggest the Ghost 17 is tailored for long-term, health-sensitive use.

Brand Reputation and Market Position

The Brooks Ghost 17 holds a bestseller rank of 61, significantly ahead of the ASICS Gel-Excite 11’s rank of 2,352. This indicates stronger market demand and broader consumer acceptance for the Brooks model. The Ghost 17’s high ranking aligns with its premium positioning and endorsements like the APMA Seal and carbon neutrality certification. The ASICS Gel-Excite 11, while less prominent in sales rankings, still maintains a solid presence with consistent availability and competitive pricing. Its lower rank may reflect niche appeal or fewer marketing investments compared to Brooks’ established reputation.

Which should you buy?

Choose the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 if you want a cost-effective, cushioned running shoe with breathable construction and a soft ride—especially if you're looking for a $35.05 savings over the Brooks Ghost 17. Opt for the Brooks Women’s Ghost 17 if you prioritize certified diabetic safety, carbon neutrality, enhanced cushioning depth (1mm heel, 3mm forefoot), and a proven track record reflected in its top 100 bestseller rank. The Ghost 17 commands a higher price but offers specialized benefits and broader credibility in the running community.