ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, vs ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are significantly cheaper than the Gel-Kayano 31, priced at $69.95 compared to $124.95 for the Gel-Kayano 31. This means the Gel-Pulse 17 is about 44% less expensive, making it a more budget-friendly option for those looking to save money without compromising on quality. While the Gel-Kayano 31 is priced higher, it is also important to consider what you are getting for that additional cost.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the Gel-Kayano 31 offers advanced cushioning features like the FF BLAST PLUS ECO and Rearfoot PureGEL technology, designed to provide a cloud-like feel and softer landings. This shoe aims to create a smooth and comfortable experience during distance training. On the other hand, the Gel-Pulse 17 incorporates AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning and Rearfoot GEL technology, which also provide good comfort for daily wear. While both shoes focus on cushioning, the Gel-Kayano 31 may appeal more to serious runners due to its advanced stability features.

Stability Features

The Gel-Kayano 31 stands out with its 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, which helps create adaptive stability for a more balanced stride. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who require additional support during long-distance runs. In contrast, the Gel-Pulse 17 lacks such advanced stability technology but still offers adequate support through its gel cushioning. For those who prioritize stability in their running shoes, the Gel-Kayano 31 may be the better choice.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the Gel-Kayano 31 is available in a striking Coffee/NOVA Orange color combination, which may appeal to those looking for something stylish and bold. The Gel-Pulse 17, with its Gravel/Lilac HINT colorway, offers a more understated look. Both designs have their merits, but the Gel-Kayano 31’s vibrant aesthetic might be more appealing to fashion-conscious runners. Ultimately, your choice may depend on personal style preferences.

Upper Material

The Gel-Kayano 31 features an engineered mesh upper that enhances breathability, making it suitable for longer runs, especially in warmer conditions. The knit heel pull tab also allows for easy on and off, which is an advantage for those who value convenience. The Gel-Pulse 17, while equipped with a standard mesh upper, does not highlight breathability to the same extent. As a result, runners seeking enhanced ventilation during their workouts may lean towards the Gel-Kayano 31.

Weight and Fit

Weight can significantly impact a runner's performance, and the Gel-Kayano 31 is designed to be lightweight while still providing ample support and cushioning. It is crafted to offer a comfortable fit, making it ideal for long-distance training. The Gel-Pulse 17, while also designed for comfort, may not cater to performance-oriented runners in the same way. For those who prioritize a lightweight design for speed, the Gel-Kayano 31 could be the preferred option.

Sales Ranking

The Gel-Pulse 17 holds a better sales rank, currently at 12,467, compared to the Gel-Kayano 31's rank of 26,176. This indicates that the Gel-Pulse 17 is more popular among consumers and may suggest a wider appeal for casual or budget-conscious runners. However, the Gel-Kayano 31’s advanced features may justify its higher price point for serious athletes looking for performance enhancements.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 and the Gel-Pulse 17 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are a serious runner looking for advanced stability, superior cushioning, and a lightweight design, the Gel-Kayano 31, priced at $124.95, may be worth the investment. However, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly option that still offers decent comfort and performance for general running or daily wear, the Gel-Pulse 17 at $69.95 is an excellent choice.