vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive leads on support and breathability.

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 offers better value and popularity, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 excels in advanced cushioning and stability.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, is better

Cushioning

Advanced FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning technology

Stability

4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for adaptive stability

Breathability

Engineered mesh upper for improved airflow

Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better

Price

About 21% cheaper than ASICS

Sales Rank

Higher bestseller rank at 1,047

Cushioning

Nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 for plush comfort

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,
82
Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
88

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
BrandASICSBrooks
ModelGel-Kayano 31Adrenaline GTS 24
WeightLightweightLightweight
UpperEngineered meshEngineered air mesh
Cushioning TypeFF BLAST PLUS ECODNA Loft v3

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 is priced at $124.95, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is available for $98.95, making it about 21% cheaper. This significant price difference might influence buyers who are budget-conscious or looking for high-performance running shoes without breaking the bank. Although the Gel-Kayano 31 offers advanced features, the lower price of the Adrenaline GTS 24 could appeal to many runners seeking reliable support and comfort.

Comfort and Cushioning

Both the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 emphasize comfort, but they utilize different technologies to achieve this. The Gel-Kayano 31 features FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning and Rearfoot PureGEL technology, promising lightweight cushioning and softer landings for a smooth ride, particularly during long runs. On the other hand, the Adrenaline GTS 24 incorporates nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, offering plush comfort that adapts to individual strides. This unique characteristic makes it suitable for runners who appreciate a personalized feel with every step.

Stability Features

When it comes to stability, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 employs a 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that provides adaptive stability, enhancing the runner's balance throughout their stride. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 utilizes the GUIDERAILS HOLISTIC SUPPORT SYSTEM, which keeps excess movement in check while supporting the body's natural motion path. These advanced stability features make both shoes excellent choices for runners who require support but cater to slightly different preferences in stability technology.

Breathability

Breathability is a vital factor for running shoes, especially during longer runs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 is designed with an engineered mesh upper for improved airflow, helping to keep your feet cool and comfortable. Similarly, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features an engineered air mesh upper that allows for breathability, stretch, and structure for a comfortable fit. Both shoes excel in this category, but the choice may come down to personal preference in upper design and feel.

Sales Performance

In terms of sales performance, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 ranks significantly higher with a bestseller rank of 1,047 compared to the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31, which has a rank of 26,176. This difference suggests that the Adrenaline GTS 24 has a more substantial market presence and popularity among consumers, potentially indicating higher consumer satisfaction and trust in the product.

Fit and Sizing

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 is available in a size 10, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 comes in size 9, medium width. Both brands typically offer a range of sizes to accommodate various foot shapes and preferences. However, the Gel-Kayano 31 may provide a better choice for those needing a larger size. The fit of each shoe is crucial, and it’s recommended to try on both models to determine which provides the best comfort and support for individual foot shape.

Aesthetic Appeal

Aesthetically, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 comes in a Coffee/NOVA Orange color scheme, which may appeal to those looking for a vibrant and stylish option. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24, with its classic Black/Black/Ebony design, offers a more understated look, appealing to runners who prefer a timeless style. The choice between these two will depend on personal taste, as both shoes provide excellent performance regardless of their appearance.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 ultimately depends on your personal preferences and running needs. If budget is a primary concern, the Brooks model is about 21% cheaper and boasts a higher sales rank, indicating its popularity and user satisfaction. However, if you prioritize advanced stability and cushioning technology, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 may be the better choice. Both shoes offer excellent comfort and support, making them suitable for various types of runners.