vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, vs Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe -

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, wins on stability and comfort, Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on style.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 offers superior comfort and stability, while the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 is a budget-friendly option for beginners.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, is better

Price

Brooks is 28% cheaper.

Cushioning

ASICS features advanced FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning.

Stability

ASICS has a 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for better support.

Why Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Affordability

Brooks is more budget-friendly.

Weight

Brooks is designed to be lightweight.

Popularity

Brooks has a better sales rank.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,
85
Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe -
75

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe -
CushioningFF BLAST PLUS ECODNA LOFT v2
Upper MaterialEngineered meshPerformance mesh
Sales Rank261764355
FitAdaptiveSecure
Target UserSerious runnersBeginners

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

When it comes to price, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 is significantly more affordable than the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31. The Anthem 8 is priced at $89.95, whereas the Gel-Kayano 31 costs $124.95. This makes the Brooks shoe about 28% cheaper than its ASICS counterpart. For budget-conscious runners or those just starting their running journey, the lower price of the Anthem 8 may offer a more accessible option without sacrificing essential performance features.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort, both shoes offer unique cushioning technologies that cater to different types of runners. The Gel-Kayano 31 features FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning, designed to provide a cloud-like comfort and softer landings. This shoe is ideal for those who prioritize a plush experience during long-distance runs. On the other hand, the Brooks Anthem 8 boasts an upgraded DNA LOFT v2 midsole foam, which provides a soft, balanced underfoot experience. While both shoes excel in comfort, the ASICS may appeal more to serious distance runners looking for enhanced cushioning during extended training sessions.

Breathability and Fit

Breathability is another critical factor, and both shoes excel in this area, albeit with different technologies. The ASICS Gel-Kayano 31 utilizes an engineered mesh upper, designed for improved airflow and ventilation. Meanwhile, the Brooks Anthem 8 features a lightweight performance mesh upper that conforms to the foot's shape, ensuring a secure fit while keeping feet cool during warm-weather runs. Both options are suitable for runners seeking breathable footwear, but the Brooks shoe's design may offer slightly better adaptability to foot shape, enhancing comfort further.

Stability and Support

When it comes to stability and support, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 takes the lead with its 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM feature. This technology helps create adaptive stability for a balanced stride, making it an excellent choice for runners who need extra support during their runs. In contrast, the Brooks Anthem 8 is designed for budget-conscious runners who may not require the same level of stability features but still offers a smooth, guided experience. While both shoes aim to provide a comfortable running experience, the Gel-Kayano 31 is specifically engineered for those needing extra support.

Weight and Versatility

In terms of weight, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 is designed to be lightweight and versatile, making it suitable for everyday miles or casual fitness routines. This shoe is particularly aimed at beginners and those looking for a comfortable entry into performance running. Although the specific weight of both shoes is not provided, the Brooks shoe emphasizes its lightness and adaptability, which may give it an edge for runners who prioritize speed and ease of movement. The ASICS Gel-Kayano 31, while likely heavier due to its advanced cushioning and stability features, offers durability that can withstand rigorous training.

Sales Rank and Popularity

The best-seller rank indicates the popularity of each shoe among consumers. The Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 has a sales rank of 4,355, making it a popular choice amongst runners looking for reliable and affordable footwear. In comparison, the ASICS Gel-Kayano 31 has a sales rank of 26,176, which suggests it may not be as widely purchased as the Brooks option. This difference in sales rank could reflect the Brooks shoe's appeal to a broader audience, particularly those looking for entry-level performance running shoes.

Aesthetics and Style

Both shoes offer appealing aesthetics, but they cater to different style preferences. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 comes in a Coffee/NOVA Orange colorway, which may appeal to those looking for a bold and unique look. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 features a blend of Atlantic Deep, Skyway, and Pink, presenting a more vibrant and youthful design. While both shoes are stylish, choosing between them may ultimately depend on personal taste and how each runner wants to express their style on the road.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the decision between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 and the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 boils down to individual needs and preferences. If you're a serious runner seeking superior comfort, stability, and advanced cushioning technology, the ASICS Gel-Kayano 31 may be worth the higher price at $124.95. However, if you're a budget-conscious runner or a beginner looking for a reliable, comfortable, and stylish option, the Brooks Anthem 8 at $89.95 offers excellent value without compromising on essential features. Each shoe has its strengths, making them suitable for different types of runners, so consider your priorities before making a choice.