vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running

Updated August 2026 — New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running leads on weight and fit.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 excels in cushioning and stability, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 offers a more budget-friendly and lightweight option.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, is better

Cushioning

Advanced cushioning technology for long-distance comfort.

Stability

4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for adaptive stability.

Durability

High-quality materials for long-lasting wear.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running is better

Price

Significantly lower price at $59.99.

Weight

Lightweight design at just over 200 grams.

Sales Rank

Higher sales rank indicating popularity.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,
78
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running
BrandASICSNew Balance
ModelGel-Kayano 31Fresh Foam 520 V9
ColorCoffee/NOVA OrangeBlack/Castlerock/Rose
Cushioning TypeFF BLAST PLUS ECOFresh Foam
Upper MaterialEngineered MeshBreathable Mesh

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running

Price Comparison

When it comes to price, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 Running Shoe is significantly more budget-friendly, priced at $59.99. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes retail for $124.95. This makes the New Balance option about 52% cheaper than the ASICS model. For those looking for a cost-effective running shoe without sacrificing essential features, the New Balance provides an attractive option.

Comfort and Cushioning

The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 is designed with advanced cushioning technology, featuring FF BLAST PLUS ECO and PureGEL technology to deliver cloud-like comfort. This shoe emphasizes adaptive stability with its 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, making it ideal for long-distance runners seeking a supportive stride. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 also boasts fresh foam cushioning, providing responsive comfort over longer runs. However, it focuses on a lightweight design that weighs just over 200 grams, ensuring minimal fatigue during workouts. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the ASICS may excel in adaptive stability, whereas the New Balance shines in weight.

Breathability

Breathability is a key feature for running shoes, and both models deliver in this regard. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 includes an engineered mesh upper for enhanced airflow, ensuring your feet remain cool during workouts. Similarly, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is designed with a breathable mesh that keeps feet dry and comfortable while exercising. However, the ASICS shoe may offer slightly superior breathability due to its specific engineered design, which aids in managing heat and moisture during intensive runs.

Weight and Design

In terms of weight, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is notably lighter at just over 200 grams, making it an excellent choice for runners who prefer a shoe that feels almost weightless. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31, while comfortable, does not emphasize its weight in the product description. For those prioritizing speed and agility, the lightweight nature of the New Balance may provide an edge. However, for runners who value stability and cushioning, the ASICS may be worth the extra weight.

Durability

Durability is crucial for running shoes, especially for those who log miles regularly. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 is built with high-quality materials and features that promote long-lasting wear, particularly with its durable construction focused on stability and support. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 also includes a durable rubber outsole, providing reliable traction on various surfaces, which is essential for outdoor runners. While both shoes are designed for durability, the ASICS model may cater better to those who need robust support for extended training sessions.

Style and Aesthetics

When it comes to style, both the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 and New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 offer appealing designs. The ASICS shoe features a Coffee/NOVA Orange color scheme, providing a vibrant look that stands out. In contrast, the New Balance shoe comes in a subtler Black/Castlerock/Metallic Rose combination, appealing to those who prefer a more understated aesthetic. Ultimately, the choice in style may come down to personal preference, but both shoes are designed to look good while performing well.

Sales Performance

The sales performance of both shoes indicates their popularity among consumers. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 has a sales rank of 26,176, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 is significantly higher at 3,173. This suggests that the New Balance model is currently more popular among shoppers, likely due to its lower price point and appealing features. A strong sales rank can be an indicator of customer satisfaction, making the New Balance a compelling choice for those considering user feedback.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 520 V9 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize advanced cushioning, stability, and durability for long-distance training, the ASICS offers superior features, albeit at a higher price of $124.95. However, if you are looking for a more affordable option that provides comfort, breathability, and a lightweight design, the New Balance, priced at $59.99, is a fantastic choice. For budget-conscious runners who still want quality, the New Balance model stands out as the better option.