ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, wins on stability and comfort, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe wins on price and design.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 offers advanced stability and cushioning, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 is more budget-friendly and versatile.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, is better
Advanced Stability
4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM enhances adaptive stability.
Cushioning
Rearfoot PureGEL technology provides superior cushioning.
Durability
Built with quality materials for high-mileage training.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe is better
Price
New Balance is $39.55 cheaper.
Sales Rank
New Balance has a better sales rank of 15,925.
Versatility
Stylish design suitable for both running and lifestyle.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes, 10, | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | New Balance |
| Price | $124.95 | $85.40 |
| Sales Rank | 26176 | 15925 |
| Cushioning | PureGEL | Fresh Foam X |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Knit |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes are priced at $124.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe is significantly cheaper at $85.40. This means the New Balance shoe is about 31% less expensive than the ASICS option. For budget-conscious buyers, the New Balance shoe presents a more attractive price point without sacrificing essential features. With the ASICS shoe's average price over the last 90 days being $162.22, it's clear that the current price is a notable reduction, but the New Balance remains the more economical choice overall.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is a critical factor for running shoes, and both options excel in this category. The ASICS shoe features a Rearfoot PureGEL technology that provides lightweight cushioning and softer landings, making it ideal for long-distance training. In contrast, the New Balance shoe utilizes Fresh Foam X midsole technology, ensuring premium cushioning with each stride. While both shoes are designed for comfort, the ASICS shoe incorporates additional technologies like the 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, which enhances stability and may provide a more supportive experience for runners seeking adaptive support.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to style, both the ASICS and New Balance shoes offer unique designs that cater to different tastes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 comes in a Coffee/NOVA Orange color scheme, featuring an engineered mesh upper that improves breathability and a knit heel pull tab for easy wear. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 showcases a stylish patchwork theme, appealing for both running and lifestyle wear. While personal preference plays a significant role here, the New Balance shoe’s design is versatile enough for everyday use, which could make it more appealing to some consumers.
Breathability and Fit
Breathability is an essential aspect of a running shoe, especially for long-distance runners. The ASICS shoe incorporates an engineered mesh upper that improves airflow, promoting a cooler and more comfortable experience during runs. Meanwhile, the New Balance shoe also features a breathable knit upper, designed to offer superior comfort. Both shoes prioritize fit and breathability, but the ASICS shoe's additional mesh technology may provide a slight edge in ventilation during intense workouts.
Durability
Durability is crucial for running shoes, especially when considering frequent use. The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 is built with quality materials that support repeated use, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 features a durable rubber outsole designed to ensure lasting performance. Both shoes are constructed to handle the demands of running, but the ASICS shoe’s emphasis on adaptive stability may contribute to its longevity during high-mileage training sessions, giving it a potential edge in durability.
Performance Features
The performance features of both shoes highlight their suitability for runners. The ASICS shoe’s 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM enhances adaptive stability, aiding in maintaining a balanced stride, especially during extended runs. This is complemented by the FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning, which is designed to provide cloud-like comfort. Conversely, the New Balance shoe's Fresh Foam X technology is tailored for premium cushioning and also boasts a lightweight construction that reduces fatigue. While both options focus on performance, the ASICS shoe might be better suited for serious runners looking for advanced stability features.
Sales Rank and Popularity
In terms of popularity, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 holds a better sales rank of 15,925 compared to the ASICS Women’s Gel-Kayano 31, which has a rank of 26,176. This suggests that the New Balance shoe is more favored among consumers, potentially due to its price point and versatile design. A higher sales rank often indicates greater consumer satisfaction and trust, making the New Balance shoe a compelling option for buyers seeking a reliable running shoe.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 31 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam x Cruz V3 Running Shoe hinges on individual preferences and priorities. If budget is a primary concern, the New Balance shoe at $85.40 offers excellent value with its comfort and stylish design. However, for runners seeking advanced stability and cushioning features, the ASICS shoe, while more expensive at $124.95, may provide enhanced performance and support. Consider your specific needs and running habits to determine which shoe aligns best with your lifestyle.

